These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17017431)

  • 1. Clinical experience with the thinPrep Imager System.
    Dawson AE
    Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(5):481-2. PubMed ID: 17017431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implementation and evaluation of a new automated interactive image analysis system.
    Bolger N; Heffron C; Regan I; Sweeney M; Kinsella S; McKeown M; Creighton G; Russell J; O'Leary J
    Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(5):483-91. PubMed ID: 17017432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. HPV testing in cervical cytology practice: it's all about choice.
    Stoler MH
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 15839612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal characteristics of laboratory screening errors in cervical cytology.
    Mitchell H; Hocking J; Saville M
    Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 17017433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
    Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can we change the way we screen?: the ThinPrep Imaging System.
    Dawson AE
    Cancer; 2004 Dec; 102(6):340-4. PubMed ID: 15540250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Analysis of the intralaboratory diagnostic variability in the Imola cervical screening program].
    Fabbris E; Bucchi L; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Ghidoni D; Medri M; Bondi A
    Pathologica; 1998 Apr; 90(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 9619055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reclassification of negative smears as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in quality assurance reviews: implications and limitations.
    Stanley DE; Plowden K; Sherman ME
    Cancer; 1999 Dec; 87(6):346-50. PubMed ID: 10603187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Public expectations, achievable cervical screening sensitivity, and the standard of practice.
    Austin RM
    Cancer; 2003 Feb; 99(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12589638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [How technology and vaccination have changed the Pap test].
    Bondi A; Ghidoni D; Amadori A
    Pathologica; 1999 Feb; 91(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 10396949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blinded review of papanicolaou smears.
    Frable WJ
    Cancer; 2004 Jun; 102(3):133-5. PubMed ID: 15211470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of a self-administered tampon ThinPrep test with conventional pap smears for cervical cytology.
    Budge M; Halford J; Haran M; Mein J; Wright G
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 15904447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The results of screening by cervical cytology and of histological examination of gynaecological operation specimens.
    Lederer H; Lambourne A
    J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw; 1973 Jan; 80(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 4696563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of two simultaneously obtained cervical cytological smears.
    Sedlis A; Walters AT; Balin H; Hontz A; Lo Sciuto L
    Acta Cytol; 1974; 18(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 4526248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of unsuspected abnormalities by PAPNET-assisted review.
    Mitchell H; Medley G
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):260-4. PubMed ID: 9479349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. DIY smear tests: are they the answer to falling cervical screening rates?
    Wise J
    BMJ; 2019 Jan; 364():l361. PubMed ID: 30674464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality control in cervical cytology.
    Husain OA; Butler EB; Evans DM; Macgregor JE; Yule R
    J Clin Pathol; 1974 Dec; 27(12):935-44. PubMed ID: 4141708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Problems with audit in cervical cytology.
    Womack C; Warren AY
    Cytopathology; 2000 Jun; 11(3):200-1. PubMed ID: 10877284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statement on technical devices for innovation in cervical cytology screening.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Oct; 106(4):441. PubMed ID: 8853029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid review.
    Faraker CA
    Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 9660635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.