These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17017432)

  • 1. Implementation and evaluation of a new automated interactive image analysis system.
    Bolger N; Heffron C; Regan I; Sweeney M; Kinsella S; McKeown M; Creighton G; Russell J; O'Leary J
    Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(5):483-91. PubMed ID: 17017432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical experience with the thinPrep Imager System.
    Dawson AE
    Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(5):481-2. PubMed ID: 17017431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of ThinPrep Imager-assisted with manual screening, and its place in the New Zealand cervical cancer screening program.
    Yeong ML; Pringle E; Stewart J; Retter E
    Pathology; 2013 Aug; 45(5):474-7. PubMed ID: 23856838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal characteristics of laboratory screening errors in cervical cytology.
    Mitchell H; Hocking J; Saville M
    Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 17017433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of unsuspected abnormalities by PAPNET-assisted review.
    Mitchell H; Medley G
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):260-4. PubMed ID: 9479349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of the Thin Prep Imaging System® in the detection of squamous intraepithelial abnormalities on retrospective evaluation: can we trust the imager?
    Barroeta JE; Reilly ME; Steinhoff MM; Lawrence WD
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Feb; 40(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 22246928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multicenter comparison of manual and automated screening of AutoCyte gynecologic preparations.
    Bishop JW; Kaufman RH; Taylor DA
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 9987448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Immunocytochemical detection of p16INK4a protein in scraped cervical cells.
    Pientong C; Ekalaksananan T; Swadpanich U; Kongyingyoes B; Kritpetcharat O; Yuenyao P; Ruckait N
    Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(4):616-23. PubMed ID: 12920756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concordance between original screening and final diagnosis using imager vs. manual screen of cervical liquid-based cytology slides.
    Pacheco MC; Conley RC; Pennington DW; Bishop JW
    Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(5):575-8. PubMed ID: 18833820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assisted primary screening using the automated ThinPrep Imaging System.
    Biscotti CV; Dawson AE; Dziura B; Galup L; Darragh T; Rahemtulla A; Wills-Frank L
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb; 123(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 15842055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can we change the way we screen?: the ThinPrep Imaging System.
    Dawson AE
    Cancer; 2004 Dec; 102(6):340-4. PubMed ID: 15540250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. HPV testing in cervical cytology practice: it's all about choice.
    Stoler MH
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 15839612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
    Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid prescreening is as effective at reducing screening error as postscreening with the FocalPoint automated screening device.
    Wilgenbusch H; Mueller G; Neal M; Renshaw AA
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Nov; 39(11):818-21. PubMed ID: 20949451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of laboratory false negative smears by the PAPNET cytologic screening system.
    Mitchell H; Medley G
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):265-70. PubMed ID: 9479350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic parameters in liquid-based cervical cytology using a coagulant suspension fixative.
    Boon ME; Ouwerkerk-Noordam E; Suurmeijer AJ; Kok LP
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 16334028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of cellularity on the sensitivity of detecting squamous lesions in liquid-based cervical cytology.
    Studeman KD; Ioffe OB; Puszkiewicz J; Sauvegeot J; Henry MR
    Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(4):605-10. PubMed ID: 12920754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Analysis of the intralaboratory diagnostic variability in the Imola cervical screening program].
    Fabbris E; Bucchi L; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Ghidoni D; Medri M; Bondi A
    Pathologica; 1998 Apr; 90(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 9619055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A three-armed trial of the ThinPrep Imaging System.
    Roberts JM; Thurloe JK; Bowditch RC; Hyne SG; Greenberg M; Clarke JM; Biro C
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Feb; 35(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 17230572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid, high throughput determination of cervical cytology specimen adequacy using a capillary-based cytometer.
    Polina R; Sturgis C; Patterson J; Patterson BK
    Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2008 Mar; 74(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 18044721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.