259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17018184)
1. Immediate disambiguation of lexically ambiguous words during reading: evidence from eye movements.
Rayner K; Cook AE; Juhasz BJ; Frazier L
Br J Psychol; 2006 Nov; 97(Pt 4):467-82. PubMed ID: 17018184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The time course of plausibility effects on eye movements in reading: evidence from noun-noun compounds.
Staub A; Rayner K; Pollatsek A; Hyönä J; Majewski H
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1162-9. PubMed ID: 17983320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: investigating the subordinate-bias effect.
Sereno SC; O'Donnell PJ; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):335-50. PubMed ID: 16634674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Global context effects on processing lexically ambiguous words: evidence from eye fixations.
Kambe G; Rayner K; Duffy SA
Mem Cognit; 2001 Mar; 29(2):363-72. PubMed ID: 11352220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers.
Rayner K; Reichle ED; Stroud MJ; Williams CC; Pollatsek A
Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):448-65. PubMed ID: 16953709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words.
Rayner K; Frazier L
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Sep; 15(5):779-90. PubMed ID: 2528602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of phonological neighborhood density on eye movements during reading.
Yates M; Friend J; Ploetz DM
Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):685-92. PubMed ID: 17826758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Learning new word meanings from context: a study of eye movements.
Chaffin R; Morris RK; Seely RE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jan; 27(1):225-35. PubMed ID: 11204099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading.
Rayner K; Warren T; Juhasz BJ; Liversedge SP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Nov; 30(6):1290-301. PubMed ID: 15521805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: evidence for lexical control of eye movements.
Reingold EM; Yang J; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1677-83. PubMed ID: 20731513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of syntactic category assignment on lexical ambiguity resolution in reading: an eye movement analysis.
Folk JR; Morris RK
Mem Cognit; 2003 Jan; 31(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 12699146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bilingual lexical access in context: evidence from eye movements during reading.
Libben MR; Titone DA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 19271853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.
Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Word integration and regression programming during reading: a test of the E-Z reader 10 model.
Inhoff AW; Greenberg SN; Solomon M; Wang CA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1571-84. PubMed ID: 19803657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations.
Kliegl R; Nuthmann A; Engbert R
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Feb; 135(1):12-35. PubMed ID: 16478314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vowel processing during silent reading: evidence from eye movements.
Ashby J; Treiman R; Kessler B; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):416-24. PubMed ID: 16569156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Eye movement control in reading: evidence against semantic preprocessing.
Rayner K; Morris RK
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Feb; 18(1):163-72. PubMed ID: 1532186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phonological typicality and sentence processing.
Tanenhaus MK; Hare M
Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Mar; 11(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 17207653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
