246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17019041)
1. Dosimetric effects of patient rotational setup errors on prostate IMRT treatments.
Fu W; Yang Y; Li X; Heron DE; Huq MS; Yue NJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5321-31. PubMed ID: 17019041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.
Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric advantages of IMRT simultaneous integrated boost for high-risk prostate cancer.
Li XA; Wang JZ; Jursinic PA; Lawton CA; Wang D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(4):1251-7. PubMed ID: 15752907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of non-exclusion of the rectum from the boost PTV in IMRT treatment plans for prostate cancer patients.
Kassim I; Dirkx ML; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jul; 92(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 19278745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simultaneous integrated intensity-modulated radiotherapy boost for locally advanced gynecological cancer: radiobiological and dosimetric considerations.
Guerrero M; Li XA; Ma L; Linder J; Deyoung C; Erickson B
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(3):933-9. PubMed ID: 15936580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiobiological impact of reduced margins and treatment technique for prostate cancer in terms of tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).
Jensen I; Carl J; Lund B; Larsen EH; Nielsen J
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 20488692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A treatment planning investigation into the dosimetric effects of systematic prostate patient rotational set-up errors.
Cranmer-Sargison G
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 18674684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric and radiobiologic comparison of 3D conformal versus intensity modulated planning techniques for prostate bed radiotherapy.
Koontz BF; Das S; Temple K; Bynum S; Catalano S; Koontz JI; Montana GS; Oleson JR
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 19647638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Significant improvement in normal tissue sparing and target coverage for head and neck cancer by means of helical tomotherapy.
Fiorino C; Dell'Oca I; Pierelli A; Broggi S; De Martin E; Di Muzio N; Longobardi B; Fazio F; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 16546279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A study of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy with fiducials for localized prostate cancer including pelvic lymph nodes.
Hsu A; Pawlicki T; Luxton G; Hara W; King CR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Jul; 68(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 17459610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric evaluation of prostate rotations and their correction by couch rotations.
van Herten YR; van de Kamer JB; van Wieringen N; Pieters BR; Bel A
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 18439697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric consequences of the application of off-line setup error correction protocols and a hull-volume definition strategy for intensity modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
Baum C; Birkner M; Alber M; Paulsen F; Nüsslin F
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Jul; 76(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 16019092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with multileaf collimators (MLCs) optimization of the undulating dose distribution at the MLC edge.
Koelbl O; Schwab F; Bratengeier K; Vordermark D; Flentje M
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Feb; 181(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 15702299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Constraints and dosage for prostate cancer patients treated with conformal radiotherapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy].
Chauvet I; Gaboriaud G; Pontvert D; Zefkili S; Giraud P; Rosenwald JC; Cosset JM
Cancer Radiother; 2004 Dec; 8(6):337-51. PubMed ID: 15619378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric impact and theoretical clinical benefits of fiducial markers for dose escalated prostate cancer radiation treatment.
Gauthier I; Carrier JF; Béliveau-Nadeau D; Fortin B; Taussky D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Jul; 74(4):1128-33. PubMed ID: 19147306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of benchmark dose-volume histograms for selection of the optimal technique between three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in prostate cancer.
Luo C; Yang CC; Narayan S; Stern RL; Perks J; Goldberg Z; Ryu J; Purdy JA; Vijayakumar S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Nov; 66(4):1253-62. PubMed ID: 17145540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of IMRT planning with two-step and one-step optimization: a way to simplify IMRT.
Ludlum E; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(3):807-21. PubMed ID: 18199916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The potential for dose dumping in normal tissues with IMRT for pelvic and H&N cancers.
Reddy NM; Mazur AK; Sampath S; Osian A; Sood BM; Ravi A; Nori D
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 18262124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of conformal and intensity modulated treatment planning techniques for early prostate cancer.
Vaarkamp J; Malde R; Dixit S; Hamilton CS
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Jun; 53(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 19624299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
