99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17019044)
1. Assessing the quality of conformal treatment planning: a new tool for quantitative comparison.
Menhel J; Levin D; Alezra D; Symon Z; Pfeffer R
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5363-75. PubMed ID: 17019044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. IMRT vs. 3D noncoplanar treatment plans for maxillary sinus tumors: a new tool for quantitative evaluation.
Levin D; Menhel J; Alezra D; Pfeffer R
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 18973854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preoperative radiation treatment for rectal cancer: comparison of target coverage and small bowel NTCP in conventional vs. 3D-conformal planning.
Cella L; Ciscognetti N; Martin G; Liuzzi R; Punzo G; Solla R; Farella A; Salvatore M; Pacelli R
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 19181259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The feasibility of using Pareto fronts for comparison of treatment planning systems and delivery techniques.
Ottosson RO; Engstrom PE; Sjöström D; Behrens CF; Karlsson A; Knöös T; Ceberg C
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 18752085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver IMRT plans in the treatment of prostate cancer.
Kim Y; Verhey LJ; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2147-56. PubMed ID: 17404460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for high-grade gliomas: does IMRT increase the integral dose to normal brain?
Hermanto U; Frija EK; Lii MJ; Chang EL; Mahajan A; Woo SY
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Mar; 67(4):1135-44. PubMed ID: 17208388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of MLC leaf width and PTV margin on the treatment planning of intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery (IMSRS) or radiotherapy (IMSRT).
Chang J; Yenice KM; Jiang K; Hunt M; Narayana A
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 19410139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric and radiobiologic comparison of 3D conformal versus intensity modulated planning techniques for prostate bed radiotherapy.
Koontz BF; Das S; Temple K; Bynum S; Catalano S; Koontz JI; Montana GS; Oleson JR
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 19647638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Persistently better treatment planning results of intensity-modulated (IMRT) over conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in prostate cancer patients with significant variation of clinical target volume and/or organs-at-risk.
Fenoglietto P; Laliberte B; Allaw A; Ailleres N; Idri K; Hay MH; Moscardo CL; Gourgou S; Dubois JB; Azria D
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 18215434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can all centers plan intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) effectively? An external audit of dosimetric comparisons between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and IMRT for adjuvant chemoradiation for gastric cancer.
Chung HT; Lee B; Park E; Lu JJ; Xia P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jul; 71(4):1167-74. PubMed ID: 18234440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of conformal and intensity modulated treatment planning techniques for early prostate cancer.
Vaarkamp J; Malde R; Dixit S; Hamilton CS
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Jun; 53(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 19624299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of an optimization concept for arc-modulated cone beam therapy.
Ulrich S; Nill S; Oelfke U
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4099-119. PubMed ID: 17664597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms for treatment planning in external photon beam therapy for clinical situations.
Knöös T; Wieslander E; Cozzi L; Brink C; Fogliata A; Albers D; Nyström H; Lassen S
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5785-807. PubMed ID: 17068365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of benchmark dose-volume histograms for selection of the optimal technique between three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in prostate cancer.
Luo C; Yang CC; Narayan S; Stern RL; Perks J; Goldberg Z; Ryu J; Purdy JA; Vijayakumar S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Nov; 66(4):1253-62. PubMed ID: 17145540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Helical tomotherapy for radiotherapy in esophageal cancer: a preferred plan with better conformal target coverage and more homogeneous dose distribution.
Chen YJ; Liu A; Han C; Tsai PT; Schultheiss TE; Pezner RD; Vora N; Lim D; Shibata S; Kernstine KH; Wong JY
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 17707195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new dose-volume-based Plan Quality Index for IMRT plan comparison.
Leung LH; Kan MW; Cheng AC; Wong WK; Yau CC
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Dec; 85(3):407-17. PubMed ID: 18023487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Treatment planning with IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy.
Kristensen CA; Kjaer-Kristoffersen F; Sapru W; Berthelsen AK; Loft A; Specht L
Acta Oncol; 2007; 46(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 17453372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
