BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17019858)

  • 1. Dimensionality reduction of a pathological voice quality assessment system based on Gaussian mixture models and short-term cepstral parameters.
    Godino-Llorente JI; Gómez-Vilda P; Blanco-Velasco M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):1943-53. PubMed ID: 17019858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic detection of voice impairments by means of short-term cepstral parameters and neural network based detectors.
    Godino-Llorente JI; Gómez-Vilda P
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Feb; 51(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 14765711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discrimination of pathological voices using a time-frequency approach.
    Umapathy K; Krishnan S; Parsa V; Jamieson DG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 52(3):421-30. PubMed ID: 15759572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of audio compression in automatic detection of voice pathologies.
    Sáenz-Lechón N; Osma-Ruiz V; Godino-Llorente JI; Blanco-Velasco M; Cruz-Roldán F; Arias-Londoño JD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Dec; 55(12):2831-5. PubMed ID: 19126465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic analysis and detection of hypernasality using a group delay function.
    Vijayalakshmi P; Reddy MR; O'Shaughnessy D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Apr; 54(4):621-9. PubMed ID: 17405369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic assessment of voice quality according to the GRBAS scale.
    Sáenz-Lechón N; Godino-Llorente JI; Osma-Ruiz V; Blanco-Velasco M; Cruz-Roldán F
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():2478-81. PubMed ID: 17946516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discrimination between pathological and normal voices using GMM-SVM approach.
    Wang X; Zhang J; Yan Y
    J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 20137892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new insight into postsurgical objective voice quality evaluation: application to thyroplastic medialization.
    Manfredi C; Peretti G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Mar; 53(3):442-51. PubMed ID: 16532770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Telephony-based voice pathology assessment using automated speech analysis.
    Moran RJ; Reilly RB; de Chazal P; Lacy PD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Mar; 53(3):468-77. PubMed ID: 16532773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computerized acoustic voice analysis and subjective scaled evaluation of the voice can avoid the need for laryngoscopy after thyroid surgery.
    Ortega J; Cassinello N; Dorcaratto D; Leopaldi E
    Surgery; 2009 Mar; 145(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 19231578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pathological voice assessment.
    Dibazar AA; Berger TW; Narayanan SS
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1669-73. PubMed ID: 17946059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automatic detection of pathological voices using complexity measures, noise parameters, and mel-cepstral coefficients.
    Arias-Londoño JD; Godino-Llorente JI; Sáenz-Lechón N; Osma-Ruiz V; Castellanos-Domínguez G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Feb; 58(2):370-9. PubMed ID: 21257362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new approach to discriminative HMM training for pathological voice classification.
    Sarria-Paja M; Castellanos-Dominguez G; Delgado-Trejos E
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():4674-7. PubMed ID: 21096005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Towards objective evaluation of perceived roughness and breathiness: an approach based on mel-frequency cepstral analysis.
    Sáenz-Lechón N; Fraile R; Godino-Llorente JI; Fernández-Baíllo R; Osma-Ruiz V; Gutiérrez-Arriola JM; Arias-Londoño JD
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):52-9. PubMed ID: 20849245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MultiDimensional Voice Program analysis in children with vocal cord nodules.
    Campisi P; Tewfik TL; Pelland-Blais E; Husein M; Sadeghi N
    J Otolaryngol; 2000 Oct; 29(5):302-8. PubMed ID: 11108490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multidirectional regression (MDR)-based features for automatic voice disorder detection.
    Muhammad G; Mesallam TA; Malki KH; Farahat M; Mahmood A; Alsulaiman M
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):817.e19-27. PubMed ID: 23177748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative measurement of speech sound distortions due to inadequate dental mounting.
    Drăgănescu GE; Sinescu C; Dodenciu D
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 16880154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Critical analysis of the impact of glottal features in the classification of clinical depression in speech.
    Moore E; Clements MA; Peifer JW; Weisser L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Jan; 55(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 18232351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SVM-based identification of pathological voices.
    Chen W; Peng C; Zhu X; Wan B; Wei D
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3786-9. PubMed ID: 18002822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On combining information from modulation spectra and mel-frequency cepstral coefficients for automatic detection of pathological voices.
    Arias-Londoño JD; Godino-Llorente JI; Markaki M; Stylianou Y
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):60-9. PubMed ID: 21073260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.