These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17019862)
1. Prediction of intrauterine pressure from electrohysterography using optimal linear filtering. Skowronski MD; Harris JG; Marossero DE; Edwards RK; Euliano TY IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):1983-9. PubMed ID: 17019862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of internal uterine pressure by joint amplitude and frequency analysis of electrohysterographic signals. Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar JO; Oei GS; Bergmans JW Physiol Meas; 2008 Jul; 29(7):829-41. PubMed ID: 18583724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of intrauterine pressure waveform from transabdominal electrohysterography. Euliano T; Skowronski M; Marossero D; Shuster J; Edwards R J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Dec; 19(12):811-6. PubMed ID: 17190691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between electrohysterogram and internal uterine pressure: a preliminary study. Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar JO; Aelen P; Oei SG; Bergmans JW Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1661-4. PubMed ID: 17946058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Myometrium electromechanical modeling for internal uterine pressure estimation by electrohysterography. Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar JO; Oei SG; Bergmans JW Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6259-62. PubMed ID: 19963667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New electrohysterogram-based estimators of intrauterine pressure signal, tonus and contraction peak for non-invasive labor monitoring. Benalcazar-Parra C; Garcia-Casado J; Ye-Lin Y; Alberola-Rubio J; Lopez Á; Perales-Marin A; Prats-Boluda G Physiol Meas; 2019 Sep; 40(8):085003. PubMed ID: 31370050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ridge extraction from the time-frequency representation (TFR) of signals based on an image processing approach: application to the analysis of uterine electromyogram AR TFR. Terrien J; Marque C; Germain G IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 May; 55(5):1496-503. PubMed ID: 18440895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A validation of electrohysterography for uterine activity monitoring during labour. Jacod BC; Graatsma EM; Van Hagen E; Visser GH J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jan; 23(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 19672790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uterine electromyogram database and processing function interface: An open standard analysis platform for electrohysterogram signals. Terrien J; Marque C; Gondry J; Steingrimsdottir T; Karlsson B Comput Biol Med; 2010 Feb; 40(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 20056198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods. Euliano TY; Nguyen MT; Darmanjian S; McGorray SP; Euliano N; Onkala A; Gregg AR Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 208(1):66.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23122926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the propagation analysis of electrohysterographic signals. Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar J; Oei G; Bergmans J Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3868-71. PubMed ID: 19163557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]