These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17019862)

  • 1. Prediction of intrauterine pressure from electrohysterography using optimal linear filtering.
    Skowronski MD; Harris JG; Marossero DE; Edwards RK; Euliano TY
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):1983-9. PubMed ID: 17019862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of internal uterine pressure by joint amplitude and frequency analysis of electrohysterographic signals.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar JO; Oei GS; Bergmans JW
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Jul; 29(7):829-41. PubMed ID: 18583724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of intrauterine pressure waveform from transabdominal electrohysterography.
    Euliano T; Skowronski M; Marossero D; Shuster J; Edwards R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Dec; 19(12):811-6. PubMed ID: 17190691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between electrohysterogram and internal uterine pressure: a preliminary study.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar JO; Aelen P; Oei SG; Bergmans JW
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1661-4. PubMed ID: 17946058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Myometrium electromechanical modeling for internal uterine pressure estimation by electrohysterography.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar JO; Oei SG; Bergmans JW
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6259-62. PubMed ID: 19963667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New electrohysterogram-based estimators of intrauterine pressure signal, tonus and contraction peak for non-invasive labor monitoring.
    Benalcazar-Parra C; Garcia-Casado J; Ye-Lin Y; Alberola-Rubio J; Lopez Á; Perales-Marin A; Prats-Boluda G
    Physiol Meas; 2019 Sep; 40(8):085003. PubMed ID: 31370050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A nonlinear parameterization of multivariate electrohysterographical signals.
    Radomski DS
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():13-20. PubMed ID: 26484592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low-complexity intrauterine pressure estimation using the Teager energy operator on electrohysterographic recordings.
    Rooijakkers MJ; Rabotti C; Oei SG; Aarts RM; Mischi M
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Jul; 35(7):1215-28. PubMed ID: 24853038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Denoising of the uterine EHG by an undecimated wavelet transform.
    Carré P; Leman H; Fernandez C; Marque C
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Sep; 45(9):1104-13. PubMed ID: 9735560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part II. Contractions parameters].
    Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):798-804. PubMed ID: 19140505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A multichannel time-frequency and multi-wavelet toolbox for uterine electromyography processing and visualisation.
    Batista AG; Najdi S; Godinho DM; Martins C; Serrano FC; Ortigueira MD; Rato RT
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Sep; 76():178-91. PubMed ID: 27474810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multi-channel electrohysterography enabled uterine contraction characterization and its effect in delivery assessment.
    Shen J; Liu Y; Zhang M; Pumir A; Mu L; Li B; Xu J
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Dec; 167():107697. PubMed ID: 37976821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low-complexity intrauterine pressure monitoring by Teager energy estimation.
    Rooijakkers MJ; Rabotti C; Oei SG; Aarts RM; Mischi M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():7424-7. PubMed ID: 24111461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Prognostic value of chosen parameters of mechanical and bioelectrical uterine activity in prediction of threatening preterm labour].
    Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
    Ginekol Pol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 19382611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrohysterography during pregnancy: preliminary report.
    Gondry J; Marque C; Duchene J; Cabrol D
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1993; 27(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 8369867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ridge extraction from the time-frequency representation (TFR) of signals based on an image processing approach: application to the analysis of uterine electromyogram AR TFR.
    Terrien J; Marque C; Germain G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 May; 55(5):1496-503. PubMed ID: 18440895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A validation of electrohysterography for uterine activity monitoring during labour.
    Jacod BC; Graatsma EM; Van Hagen E; Visser GH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jan; 23(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 19672790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uterine electromyogram database and processing function interface: An open standard analysis platform for electrohysterogram signals.
    Terrien J; Marque C; Gondry J; Steingrimsdottir T; Karlsson B
    Comput Biol Med; 2010 Feb; 40(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 20056198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods.
    Euliano TY; Nguyen MT; Darmanjian S; McGorray SP; Euliano N; Onkala A; Gregg AR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 208(1):66.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23122926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the propagation analysis of electrohysterographic signals.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar J; Oei G; Bergmans J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3868-71. PubMed ID: 19163557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.