1834 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17022207)
1. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium.
Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Weber L; Ginjaume M; Eudaldo T; Jurado D; Ruiz A; Ribas M
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2899-911. PubMed ID: 15543799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of calculation algorithm on dose distribution in irradiation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) collapsed cone versus pencil beam.
Koelbl O; Krieger T; Haedinger U; Sauer O; Flentje M
Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Dec; 180(12):783-8. PubMed ID: 15592698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental verification of lung dose with radiochromic film: comparison with Monte Carlo simulations and commercially available treatment planning systems.
Paelinck L; Reynaert N; Thierens H; De Neve W; De Wagter C
Phys Med Biol; 2005 May; 50(9):2055-69. PubMed ID: 15843736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A clinical study of lung cancer dose calculation accuracy with Monte Carlo simulation.
Zhao Y; Qi G; Yin G; Wang X; Wang P; Li J; Xiao M; Li J; Kang S; Liao X
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Dec; 9():287. PubMed ID: 25511623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantification of the impact of MLC modeling and tissue heterogeneities on dynamic IMRT dose calculations.
Mihaylov IB; Lerma FA; Fatyga M; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1244-52. PubMed ID: 17500456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.
Panettieri V; Wennberg B; Gagliardi G; Duch MA; Ginjaume M; Lax I
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4265-81. PubMed ID: 17664607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrospective monte carlo dose calculations with limited beam weight information.
Lindsay PE; El Naqa I; Hope AJ; Vicic M; Cui J; Bradley JD; Deasy JO
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):334-46. PubMed ID: 17278519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of 6 MV and 18 MV photons for IMRT treatment of lung cancer.
Madani I; Vanderstraeten B; Bral S; Coghe M; De Gersem W; De Wagter C; Thierens H; De Neve W
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Jan; 82(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 17182143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of dose calculation algorithms on the predicted dose distribution and NTCP values for NSCLC patients.
Nielsen TB; Wieslander E; Fogliata A; Nielsen M; Hansen O; Brink C
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2412-8. PubMed ID: 21776775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of IMRT optimization based on a pencil beam and a superposition algorithm.
Scholz C; Nill S; Oelfke U
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1909-13. PubMed ID: 12906209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of calculation model on dose distribution in stereotactic radiotherapy for pulmonary targets.
Haedinger U; Krieger T; Flentje M; Wulf J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jan; 61(1):239-49. PubMed ID: 15629617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The importance of accurate linear accelerator head modelling for IMRT Monte Carlo calculations.
Reynaert N; Coghe M; De Smedt B; Paelinck L; Vanderstraeten B; De Gersem W; Van Duyse B; De Wagter C; De Neve W; Thierens H
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):831-46. PubMed ID: 15798258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue heterogeneities corrections in the treatment of head and neck cancer patients using stereotactic radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; McClinton C; Sood S; Badkul R; Saleh H; Jiang H; Lominska C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):258-270. PubMed ID: 27074489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pareto front analysis of 6 and 15 MV dynamic IMRT for lung cancer using pencil beam, AAA and Monte Carlo.
Ottosson RO; Karlsson A; Behrens CF
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4521-33. PubMed ID: 20668346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Collapsed cone convolution and analytical anisotropic algorithm dose calculations compared to VMC++ Monte Carlo simulations in clinical cases.
Hasenbalg F; Neuenschwander H; Mini R; Born EJ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3679-91. PubMed ID: 17664570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
