203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17022208)
1. Resolution at oblique incidence angles of a flat panel imager for breast tomosynthesis.
Mainprize JG; Bloomquist AK; Kempston MP; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3159-64. PubMed ID: 17022208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anisotropic imaging performance in breast tomosynthesis.
Badano A; Kyprianou IS; Jennings RJ; Sempau J
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4076-91. PubMed ID: 18074617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
Hu YH; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A fast, angle-dependent, analytical model of CsI detector response for optimization of 3D x-ray breast imaging systems.
Freed M; Park S; Badano A
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2593-605. PubMed ID: 20632571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of a high fill factor, indirect detection prototype flat-panel imager for mammography.
El-Mohri Y; Antonuk LE; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Sawant A
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):315-27. PubMed ID: 17278517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
Boyce SJ; Samei E
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao B; Zhou J; Hu YH; Mertelmeier T; Ludwig J; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):240-51. PubMed ID: 19235392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
Samant SS; Gopal A
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The imaging performance of compact Lu2O3:Eu powdered phosphor screens: Monte Carlo simulation for applications in mammography.
Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS
Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1985-97. PubMed ID: 19610287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of antiscatter grids on soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detectors.
Siewerdsen JH; Moseley DJ; Bakhtiar B; Richard S; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3506-20. PubMed ID: 15651634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer modeling of the spatial resolution properties of a dedicated breast CT system.
Yang K; Kwan AL; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):2059-69. PubMed ID: 17654909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Design and characterization of a spatially distributed multibeam field emission x-ray source for stationary digital breast tomosynthesis.
Qian X; Rajaram R; Calderon-Colon X; Yang G; Phan T; Lalush DS; Lu J; Zhou O
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4389-99. PubMed ID: 19928069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High resolution stationary digital breast tomosynthesis using distributed carbon nanotube x-ray source array.
Qian X; Tucker A; Gidcumb E; Shan J; Yang G; Calderon-Colon X; Sultana S; Lu J; Zhou O; Spronk D; Sprenger F; Zhang Y; Kennedy D; Farbizio T; Jing Z
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2090-9. PubMed ID: 22482630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the imaging properties of an amorphous selenium-based flat panel detector for digital fluoroscopy.
Hunt DC; Tousignant O; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1166-75. PubMed ID: 15191306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-resolution imager for digital mammography: physical characterization of a prototype sensor.
Suryanarayanan S; Karellas A; Vedantham S; Onishi SK
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3957-69. PubMed ID: 16177523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Study of DQE dependence with beam quality on GE essential mammography flat panel.
García-Mollá R; Linares R; Ayala R
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 12(1):3176. PubMed ID: 21330969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative image quality measurements of a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
Rofo; 2013 Dec; 185(12):1188-94. PubMed ID: 23888475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Signal and noise transfer properties of CMOS based active pixel flat panel imager coupled to structured CsI:Tl.
Arvanitis CD; Bohndiek SE; Blakesley J; Olivo A; Speller RD
Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):116-26. PubMed ID: 19235380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
