116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17022214)
1. A comparison of techniques for simulating set-up error and uncertainty in head and neck IMRT.
Ploquin N; Kay I; Rangel-Baltazar A; Lau H; Dunscombe P
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3213-9. PubMed ID: 17022214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intensity modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer: the sensitivity of plan objectives and constraints to set-up uncertainty.
Ploquin N; Song W; Lau H; Dunscombe P
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3515-33. PubMed ID: 16030380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of interfractional set-up errors and intrafractional organ motions during IMRT for head and neck tumors to define an appropriate planning target volume (PTV)- and planning organs at risk volume (PRV)-margins.
Suzuki M; Nishimura Y; Nakamatsu K; Okumura M; Hashiba H; Koike R; Kanamori S; Shibata T
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 16564594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric influences of rotational setup errors on head and neck carcinoma intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments.
Fu W; Yang Y; Yue NJ; Heron DE; Saiful Huq M
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 23266161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving IMRT dose accuracy via deliverable Monte Carlo optimization for the treatment of head and neck cancer patients.
Dogan N; Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Lerma F; Wu Y; Fatyga M; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4033-43. PubMed ID: 17153383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new method of incorporating systematic uncertainties in intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization.
Yang J; Mageras GS; Spirou SV; Jackson A; Yorke E; Ling CC; Chui CS
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2567-79. PubMed ID: 16193787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and linac-IMRT treatment plans for head and neck cancer patients.
Zhang X; Penagaricano J; Moros EG; Corry PM; Yan Y; Ratanatharathorn V
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 19944587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric and radiobiological impact of dose fractionation on respiratory motion induced IMRT delivery errors: a volumetric dose measurement study.
Duan J; Shen S; Fiveash JB; Popple RA; Brezovich IA
Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1380-7. PubMed ID: 16752574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EUD-based margin selection in the presence of set-up uncertainties.
Song W; Dunscombe P
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):849-59. PubMed ID: 15125003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric effects of patient rotational setup errors on prostate IMRT treatments.
Fu W; Yang Y; Li X; Heron DE; Huq MS; Yue NJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5321-31. PubMed ID: 17019041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The theoretical benefit of beam fringe compensation and field size reduction for iso-normal tissue complication probability dose escalation in radiotherapy of lung cancer.
Engelsman M; Remeijer P; van Herk M; Mijnheer B; Damen E
Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1086-95. PubMed ID: 12852532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regularization of inverse planning for intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Chvetsov AV; Calvetti D; Sohn JW; Kinsella TJ
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):501-14. PubMed ID: 15789597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment simulation approaches for the estimation of the distributions of treatment quality parameters generated by geometrical uncertainties.
Baum C; Alber M; Birkner M; Nüsslin F
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Dec; 49(24):5475-88. PubMed ID: 15724537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Limitations of a convolution method for modeling geometric uncertainties in radiation therapy: the radiobiological dose-per-fraction effect.
Song W; Battista J; Van Dyk J
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):3034-45. PubMed ID: 15587657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.
Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric comparison of split field and fixed jaw techniques for large IMRT target volumes in the head and neck.
Srivastava SP; Das IJ; Kumar A; Johnstone PA
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 19944592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Significant improvement in normal tissue sparing and target coverage for head and neck cancer by means of helical tomotherapy.
Fiorino C; Dell'Oca I; Pierelli A; Broggi S; De Martin E; Di Muzio N; Longobardi B; Fazio F; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 16546279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy requirements for head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy based on observed dose response of the major salivary glands.
Kapanen M; Collan J; Saarilahti K; Heikkonen J; Kairemo K; Tenhunen M
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 19435641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
