These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17022223)
41. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean MAS reduction? Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Oikonomou I; Damilakis J Invest Radiol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):654-62. PubMed ID: 21673583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Japanese adult male voxel phantom constructed on the basis of CT images. Sato K; Noguchi H; Emoto Y; Koga S; Saito K Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 16905760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparison of head and body organ doses in CT. Huda W; Ogden KM Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):N9-N14. PubMed ID: 18184987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Specific absorbed fractions for internal photon emitters calculated for a tomographic model of a pregnant woman. Shi CY; Xu XG; Stabin MG Health Phys; 2004 Nov; 87(5):507-11. PubMed ID: 15551788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Radiation doses from small-bowel follow-through and abdominopelvic MDCT in Crohn's disease. Jaffe TA; Gaca AM; Delaney S; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; Frush DP AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1015-22. PubMed ID: 17954634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Specific absorbed fraction for Korean adult voxel phantom from internal photon source. Lee C; Park S; Lee JK Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 17110390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Fundamental image quality limits for microcomputed tomography in small animals. Ford NL; Thornton MM; Holdsworth DW Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2869-77. PubMed ID: 14655933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Assessment of organ absorbed doses and estimation of effective doses from pediatric anthropomorphic phantom measurements for multi-detector row CT with and without automatic exposure control. Brisse HJ; Robilliard M; Savignoni A; Pierrat N; Gaboriaud G; De Rycke Y; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC Health Phys; 2009 Oct; 97(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 19741359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Validation of metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for organ dose assessment during CT: comparison with thermoluminescent dosimetry. Yoshizumi TT; Goodman PC; Frush DP; Nguyen G; Toncheva G; Sarder M; Barnes L AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 May; 188(5):1332-6. PubMed ID: 17449779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Estimating effective dose to pediatric patients undergoing interventional radiology procedures using anthropomorphic phantoms and MOSFET dosimeters. Miksys N; Gordon CL; Thomas K; Connolly BL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):1315-22. PubMed ID: 20410420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Generating and using patient-specific whole-body models for organ dose estimates in CT with increased accuracy: feasibility and validation. Kalender WA; Saltybaeva N; Kolditz D; Hupfer M; Beister M; Schmidt B Phys Med; 2014 Dec; 30(8):925-33. PubMed ID: 25288527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Organ and effective doses in infants undergoing upper gastrointestinal (UGI) fluoroscopic examination. Staton RJ; Williams JL; Arreola MM; Hintenlang DE; Bolch WE Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):703-10. PubMed ID: 17388188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers. Boice JD; Leggett RW; Ellis ED; Wallace PW; Mumma M; Cohen SS; Brill AB; Chadda B; Boecker BB; Yoder RC; Eckerman KF Health Phys; 2006 May; 90(5):409-30. PubMed ID: 16607174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Monte carlo simulations of dose from microCT imaging procedures in a realistic mouse phantom. Taschereau R; Chow PL; Chatziioannou AF Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):216-24. PubMed ID: 16485428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. DEVELOPMENT OF AGE-SPECIFIC JAPANESE PHYSICAL PHANTOMS FOR DOSE EVALUATION IN INFANT CT EXAMINATIONS. Yamauchi-Kawaura C; Fujii K; Akahane K; Yamauchi M; Obara S; Narai K; Katsu T; Imai K; Ikeda M Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Dec; 171(4):483-502. PubMed ID: 26420904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Discrepancy between absorbed dose estimated from phantom measurements and from estimates using data on individual head sizes in head CT examinations. Adliene D; Mockeviciene S Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):186-90. PubMed ID: 20167791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Evaluation of parameters influencing S values in mouse dosimetry. Hindorf C; Ljungberg M; Strand SE J Nucl Med; 2004 Nov; 45(11):1960-5. PubMed ID: 15534069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Influence of phantom diameter, kVp and scan mode upon computed tomography dose index. Nickoloff EL; Dutta AK; Lu ZF Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 12674240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The standfast whole body counter and the sliced BOMAB phantom: efficiency as a function of number of sources and energy modeled by MCNP5. Kramer GH; Capello K Health Phys; 2007 Feb; 92(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 17220718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]