289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17022235)
1. Novel lung IMRT planning algorithms with nonuniform dose delivery strategy to account for respiratory motion.
Li X; Zhang P; Mah D; Gewanter R; Kutcher G
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3390-8. PubMed ID: 17022235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A method of calculating a lung clinical target volume DVH for IMRT with intrafractional motion.
Kung JH; Zygmanski P; Choi N; Chen GT
Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1103-9. PubMed ID: 12852534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of intra-fraction organ motion on the delivery of intensity-modulated field with a multileaf collimator.
Chui CS; Yorke E; Hong L
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1736-46. PubMed ID: 12906191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantifying the effect of intrafraction motion during breast IMRT planning and dose delivery.
George R; Keall PJ; Kini VR; Vedam SS; Siebers JV; Wu Q; Lauterbach MH; Arthur DW; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):552-62. PubMed ID: 12722807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accounting for center-of-mass target motion using convolution methods in Monte Carlo-based dose calculations of the lung.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Balter JM; Ten Haken RK
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):925-32. PubMed ID: 15125011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The susceptibility of IMRT dose distributions to intrafraction organ motion: an investigation into smoothing filters derived from four dimensional computed tomography data.
Coolens C; Evans PM; Seco J; Webb S; Blackall JM; Rietzel E; Chen GT
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2809-18. PubMed ID: 16964857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric and radiobiological impact of dose fractionation on respiratory motion induced IMRT delivery errors: a volumetric dose measurement study.
Duan J; Shen S; Fiveash JB; Popple RA; Brezovich IA
Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1380-7. PubMed ID: 16752574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Residual motion of lung tumors in end-of-inhale respiratory gated radiotherapy based on external surrogates.
Berbeco RI; Nishioka S; Shirato H; Jiang SB
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4149-56. PubMed ID: 17153393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A robust approach to IMRT optimization.
Chan TC; Bortfeld T; Tsitsiklis JN
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2567-83. PubMed ID: 16675870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. IMRT: improvement in treatment planning efficiency using NTCP calculation independent of the dose-volume-histogram.
Grigorov GN; Chow JC; Grigorov L; Jiang R; Barnett RB
Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1250-8. PubMed ID: 16752559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct aperture optimization of breast IMRT and the dosimetric impact of respiration motion.
Zhang G; Jiang Z; Shepard D; Zhang B; Yu C
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):N357-69. PubMed ID: 17019024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Importing measured field fluences into the treatment planning system to validate a breathing synchronized DMLC-IMRT irradiation technique.
Verellen D; Tournel K; Linthout N; Soete G; Wauters T; Storme G
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):332-8. PubMed ID: 16533540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of breathing motion versus heterogeneity effects in lung cancer treatment planning.
Rosu M; Chetty IJ; Tatro DS; Ten Haken RK
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1462-73. PubMed ID: 17500477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.
Panettieri V; Wennberg B; Gagliardi G; Duch MA; Ginjaume M; Lax I
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4265-81. PubMed ID: 17664607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose reconstruction in deforming lung anatomy: dose grid size effects and clinical implications.
Rosu M; Chetty IJ; Balter JM; Kessler ML; McShan DL; Ten Haken RK
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2487-95. PubMed ID: 16193778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental validation of the van Herk margin formula for lung radiation therapy.
Ecclestone G; Bissonnette JP; Heath E
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111721. PubMed ID: 24320429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Significant improvement in normal tissue sparing and target coverage for head and neck cancer by means of helical tomotherapy.
Fiorino C; Dell'Oca I; Pierelli A; Broggi S; De Martin E; Di Muzio N; Longobardi B; Fazio F; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 16546279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Step and shoot IMRT to mobile targets and techniques to mitigate the interplay effect.
Ehler ED; Tomé WA
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(13):4311-24. PubMed ID: 19531851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
