138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17022242)
1. Experimental determination of subjective similarity for pairs of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: observer study results.
Muramatsu C; Li Q; Schmidt R; Suzuki K; Shiraishi J; Newstead G; Doi K
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3460-8. PubMed ID: 17022242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation of psychophysical similarity measures for selection of similar images in the diagnosis of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms.
Muramatsu C; Li Q; Schmidt R; Shiraishi J; Doi K
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5695-702. PubMed ID: 19175126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of subjective similarity for pairs of masses and pairs of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: comparison of similarity ranking scores and absolute similarity ratings.
Muramatsu C; Li Q; Schmidt RA; Shiraishi J; Suzuki K; Newstead GM; Doi K
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2890-5. PubMed ID: 17821997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of perceived similarity between pairs of microcalcification clusters in mammograms.
Wang J; Jing H; Wernick MN; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051904. PubMed ID: 24784383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An investigation of radiologists' perception of lesion similarity: observations with paired breast masses on mammograms and paired lung nodules on CT images.
Kumazawa S; Muramatsu C; Li Q; Li F; Shiraishi J; Caligiuri P; Schmidt RA; MacMahon H; Doi K
Acad Radiol; 2008 Jul; 15(7):887-94. PubMed ID: 18572125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Potential usefulness of similar images in the differential diagnosis of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms.
Nakayama R; Abe H; Shiraishi J; Doi K
Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):625-31. PubMed ID: 19789245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigation of psychophysical measure for evaluation of similar images for mammographic masses: preliminary results.
Muramatsu C; Li Q; Suzuki K; Schmidt RA; Shiraishi J; Newstead GM; Doi K
Med Phys; 2005 Jul; 32(7):2295-304. PubMed ID: 16121585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for histological classification of clustered microcalcifications on magnification mammograms.
Nakayama R; Uchiyama Y; Watanabe R; Katsuragawa S; Namba K; Doi K
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):789-99. PubMed ID: 15124996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications.
Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM; Schmidt RA; Toledano AY; Doi K
Radiology; 2001 Sep; 220(3):787-94. PubMed ID: 11526283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital mammography: observer performance study of the effects of pixel size on the characterization of malignant and benign microcalcifications.
Chan HP; Helvie MA; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Adler DD; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Blane CE; Joynt LK; Wilson TE; Hadjiiski LM; Goodsitt MM
Acad Radiol; 2001 Jun; 8(6):454-66. PubMed ID: 11394537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigation of psychophysical measure for evaluation of similar images for mammographic masses: Preliminary results.
Muramatsu C; Li Q; Suzuki K; Schmidt RA; Shiraishi J; Newstead GM; Doi K
Med Phys; 2005 Jul; 32(7Part1):2295-2304. PubMed ID: 28493579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of independent double readings and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for the diagnosis of breast calcifications.
Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM; Schmidt RA; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):84-94. PubMed ID: 16399036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radial gradient-based segmentation of mammographic microcalcifications: observer evaluation and effect on CAD performance.
Paquerault S; Yarusso LM; Papaioannou J; Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 15487748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammograms.
Zheng B; Chang YH; Staiger M; Good W; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 1995 Aug; 2(8):655-62. PubMed ID: 9419620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. LCD versus CRT monitors for digital mammography: a comparison of observer performance for the detection of clustered microcalcifications and masses.
Cha JH; Moon WK; Cho N; Lee EH; Park JS; Jang MJ
Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1104-8. PubMed ID: 19922305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Real and simulated clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. ROC study of observer performance.
Lado MJ; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Méndez AJ; Vidal JJ
Med Phys; 1997 Sep; 24(9):1385-94. PubMed ID: 9304566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Observer sensitivity to small differences: a multipoint rank-order experiment.
Good WF; Sumkin JH; Dash N; Johns CM; Zuley ML; Rockette HE; Gur D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):275-8. PubMed ID: 10430118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subjective similarity of patterns of diffuse interstitial lung disease on thin-section CT: an observer performance study.
Li F; Kumazawa S; Shiraishi J; Li Q; Engelmann R; Caligiuri P; MacMahon H; Doi K
Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):477-85. PubMed ID: 19268860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantification of Al-equivalent thickness of just visible microcalcifications in full field digital mammograms.
Carton AK; Bosmans H; Vandenbroucke D; Souverijns G; Van Ongeval C; Dragusin O; Marchal G
Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2165-76. PubMed ID: 15305471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
