These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17022930)

  • 1. Top-down influences make saccades deviate away: the case of endogenous cues.
    Van der Stigchel S; Meeter M; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):279-90. PubMed ID: 17022930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An ERP study of preparatory and inhibitory mechanisms in a cued saccade task.
    Van der Stigchel S; Heslenfeld DJ; Theeuwes J
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):32-45. PubMed ID: 16595127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of attending to multiple locations on eye movements.
    Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J
    Vision Res; 2005 Jul; 45(15):1921-7. PubMed ID: 15820510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Saccade trajectory deviations and inhibition-of-return: Measuring the amount of attentional processing.
    Theeuwes J; Van der Stigchel S
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1307-15. PubMed ID: 18723045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Paying attention to saccadic intrusions.
    Gowen E; Abadi RV; Poliakoff E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):810-25. PubMed ID: 16256318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The spatial coding of the inhibition evoked by distractors.
    Van der Stigchel S; Meeter M; Theeuwes J
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 17173947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gaze and arrow distractors influence saccade trajectories similarly.
    Hermens F; Walker R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Nov; 63(11):2120-40. PubMed ID: 20486017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between inhibition of return and saccade trajectory deviations.
    Godijn R; Theeuwes J; Godijn R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun; 30(3):538-54. PubMed ID: 15161385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early and late modulation of saccade deviations by target distractor similarity.
    Mulckhuyse M; Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Sep; 102(3):1451-8. PubMed ID: 19553494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Control of visually guided saccades in multiple sclerosis: Disruption to higher-order processes.
    Fielding J; Kilpatrick T; Millist L; White O
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jun; 47(7):1647-53. PubMed ID: 19397859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inhibition of return generated by voluntary saccades is independent of attentional momentum.
    Machado L; Rafal R
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Jul; 57(5):789-96. PubMed ID: 15204117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endogenous saccade preparation does not produce inhibition of return: failure to replicate Rafal, Calabresi, Brennan, & Sciolto (1989).
    Chica AB; Klein RM; Rafal RD; Hopfinger JB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1193-206. PubMed ID: 20731522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eye cannot see it: the interference of subliminal distractors on saccade metrics.
    Van der Stigchel S; Mulckhuyse M; Theeuwes J
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(16):2104-9. PubMed ID: 19500616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mixed pro and antisaccade performance in children and adults.
    Irving EL; Tajik-Parvinchi DJ; Lillakas L; González EG; Steinbach MJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():67-74. PubMed ID: 19103183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microsaccadic response during inhibition of return in a target-target paradigm.
    Betta E; Galfano G; Turatto M
    Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(3):428-36. PubMed ID: 17087989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory.
    Soto D; Heinke D; Humphreys GW; Blanco MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Apr; 31(2):248-61. PubMed ID: 15826228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of central and peripheral cueing on perceptual and saccade performance.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():26-33. PubMed ID: 29262304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cueing the location of a distractor: an inhibitory mechanism of spatial attention?
    Munneke J; Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 18589391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of semantic information on saccade trajectory deviations.
    Weaver MD; Lauwereyns J; Theeuwes J
    Vision Res; 2011 May; 51(10):1124-8. PubMed ID: 21402093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of recurrent signals about adaptation for subsequent saccade programming depends on object structure.
    Doré-Mazars K; Vergilino-Perez D; Collins T; Bohacova K; Beauvillain C
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1113(1):153-62. PubMed ID: 16938276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.