These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17023253)

  • 1. Differences in pain perception in women using concentric and monopolar needles.
    Balbierz JM; Petajan JH; Alder SC; Vlach SA
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1403-6. PubMed ID: 17023253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity for detecting fibrillation potentials: a comparison between concentric and monopolar needle electrodes.
    Sherman HB; Walker FO; Donofrio PD
    Muscle Nerve; 1990 Nov; 13(11):1023-6. PubMed ID: 2233858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "Facial" and standard concentric needle electrodes are not interchangeable.
    Barkhaus PE; Roberts MM; Nandedkar SD
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Sep; 46(5):259-61. PubMed ID: 17059096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of 3 needle sizes for trigger point injection in myofascial pain syndrome of upper- and middle-trapezius muscle: a randomized controlled trial.
    Yoon SH; Rah UW; Sheen SS; Cho KH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Aug; 90(8):1332-9. PubMed ID: 19651267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motor evoked potentials from the striated urethral sphincter: a comparison of concentric needle and surface electrodes.
    Brostrom S; Jennum P; Lose G
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2003; 22(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 12579629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Manual acupuncture for analgesia during electromyography: a pilot study.
    Smith MJ; Tong HC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 86(9):1741-4. PubMed ID: 16181936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Paraspinal electromyography that compares concentric with monopolar needles: a blinded study.
    Tong HC; Young IA; Koch J; Haig AJ; Yamakawa KS; Wallbom A
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Dec; 82(12):917-24. PubMed ID: 14627928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Properties of motor unit action potentials recorded with concentric and monopolar needle electrodes: ADEMG analysis.
    Howard JE; McGill KC; Dorfman LJ
    Muscle Nerve; 1988 Oct; 11(10):1051-5. PubMed ID: 3185599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Needle electrode insertion into the tibialis posterior: a comparison of the anterior and posterior approaches.
    Yang SN; Lee SH; Kwon HK
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Sep; 89(9):1816-8. PubMed ID: 18760169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Motor unit analysis. Comparison between concentric and monopolar electrodes.
    Pease WS; Bowyer BL
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1988 Feb; 67(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 3345237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of motor unit action potential characteristics and hand dominance using monopolar needle electrodes in the abductor pollicis brevis and abductor digiti minimi muscles.
    Nelson RM; Cauley T; Fink M; Lauretani C; Simonson T
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2003; 43(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 12613136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of motor unit action potentials using monopolar vs. concentric needle electrodes in the middle deltoid and abductor digiti minimi muscles.
    Nelson RM; Shedlock M; Kaczmarek C; Gahrs J; MacLaughlin H
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Dec; 43(8):459-64. PubMed ID: 14717026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of standard and pediatric size concentric needle EMG electrodes.
    Brownell AA; Bromberg MB
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 May; 118(5):1162-5. PubMed ID: 17382584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pain perception to nerve conduction and needle electromyographic procedures.
    Wee AS; Boyne RL; Abernathy SD; Nick TG
    J Miss State Med Assoc; 2004 Nov; 45(11):327-30. PubMed ID: 15624629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concentric and single fiber needle electrodes yield comparable jitter results in myasthenia gravis.
    Farrugia ME; Weir AI; Cleary M; Cooper S; Metcalfe R; Mallik A
    Muscle Nerve; 2009 May; 39(5):579-85. PubMed ID: 19260051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective double-blind crossover trial of ibuprofen in reducing EMG pain.
    El-Salem K; Shakhatreh M
    Muscle Nerve; 2008 Aug; 38(2):1016-20. PubMed ID: 18663736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pain perception among Emergency Department patients with headache: responses to standardized painful stimuli.
    Marco CA; Marco AP; Buderer NF; Jones JM
    J Emerg Med; 2007 Jan; 32(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 17239725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.
    Sasso RC; Smucker JD; Hacker RJ; Heller JG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2933-40; discussion 2941-2. PubMed ID: 18091483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of intra-operative motor evoked potentials in the optimization of chronic cortical stimulation for the treatment of neuropathic pain.
    Holsheimer J; Lefaucheur JP; Buitenweg JR; Goujon C; Nineb A; Nguyen JP
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Oct; 118(10):2287-96. PubMed ID: 17765605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pain experience during chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: a preliminary study.
    Vandenbossche F; Horovitz J; Guyon F; Verret C; Saura R
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Feb; 136(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 17499418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.