BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17024068)

  • 1. Bench-to-bedside solution to funding problems.
    Bakhoum SF
    Nature; 2006 Oct; 443(7111):506. PubMed ID: 17024068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Research funding. U.S. biomedicine's mother ship braces for lab closings.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Mar; 319(5868):1324-5. PubMed ID: 18323424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research funding. Structural disequilibria in biomedical research.
    Teitelbaum MS
    Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5889):644-5. PubMed ID: 18669847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The time to demand funding.
    Mello CC; Walsh JV
    Science; 2009 Jan; 323(5911):208. PubMed ID: 19131609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why aren't there more scientists advocating for funding?
    Wells RD; Farnham P
    Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1081. PubMed ID: 17110554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No more third time lucky.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7215):841. PubMed ID: 18923475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. National Institutes of Health. Zerhouni's parting message: make room for young scientists.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):834-5. PubMed ID: 18988813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CTSA program continues 'on track' despite backlog.
    Samson K
    Ann Neurol; 2009 Sep; 66(3):A9-13. PubMed ID: 19810089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomedical funding. NIH keeps grants staff but braces for change.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2004 Jan; 303(5657):451. PubMed ID: 14739431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review reviewed.
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7159):115. PubMed ID: 17851475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NIH funding: what does the future look like?
    Werner MH
    Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5822):198-200; author reply 198-200. PubMed ID: 17436447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. David versus Goliath.
    Check E; Castellani F
    Nature; 2004 Dec; 432(7017):546-8. PubMed ID: 15577877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NIH: a strategy for the 21st century?
    Nature; 1993 May; 363(6425):99-100. PubMed ID: 8483507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomedical research. The graying of NIH research.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):848-9. PubMed ID: 18988821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NIH moved quickly to help researchers after Katrina.
    Zerhouni E
    Nature; 2005 Oct; 437(7061):951. PubMed ID: 16222274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Windfall warning.
    Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7266):847-8. PubMed ID: 19829323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. National Institutes of Health eliminates funding for national architecture linking primary care research.
    Peterson KA
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2007; 20(2):229-31. PubMed ID: 17341760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Researchers frustrated by lack of input to NIH policy.
    Rockey DC
    Nature; 2006 Jun; 441(7097):1048. PubMed ID: 16810226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NIH budget. Boom and bust.
    Couzin J; Miller G
    Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5823):356-61. PubMed ID: 17446363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MD researchers.
    Jenks S
    Med World News; 1988 Dec; 29(24):40-2, 44-6, 51. PubMed ID: 10290919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.