406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17024196)
21. [Organic Law 15/2003, of 25 November, modifying the Organic Law 10/1995, of 23 November, on the Penal Code].
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2003; (19):267-8. PubMed ID: 15032109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Courts reject DNA fingerprinting, citing controversy after NAS report.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Oct; 359(6394):349. PubMed ID: 1406941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [The regulations for the forensic medical expertise of the severity of harm to health. Appendix 2 to the order of the Ministry of Public Health of the Russian Federation of 10 December 1996 No. 407].
Sud Med Ekspert; 1997; 40(2):48-53. PubMed ID: 9254457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The railway murders: R v John Duffy and R v David Mulcahy.
Bolland L
Med Sci Law; 2002 Jan; 42(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 11848136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Genetic witness: by thy DNA so shall ye be known.
Smith DM
Health Law J; 1993; 1():207-44. PubMed ID: 10569856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. New models of collaboration between criminal justice and mental health systems.
Morrissey JP; Fagan JA; Cocozza JJ
Am J Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 166(11):1211-4. PubMed ID: 19884234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Big brother and his science kit: DNA databases for 21st century crime control?
Tracy PE; Morgan V
J Crim Law Criminol; 2000; 90(2):635-90. PubMed ID: 16180286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. California's Proposition 69: a dangerous precedent for criminal DNA databases.
Simoncelli T; Steinhardt B
J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(2):279-93. PubMed ID: 16083087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The physician as gatekeeper to the use of genetic information in the criminal justice system.
Seiden SC; Morin K;
J Law Med Ethics; 2002; 30(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 11905274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Forensic science.
Giannelli PC
J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(3):535-44. PubMed ID: 16240733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Position and role of the court medical expert in the light of expectations of the legal proceedings agency].
Ustjanicz B
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 17691173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Post-conviction DNA testing: the UK's first 'exoneration' case?
Johnson P; Williams R
Sci Justice; 2004; 44(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 15112595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. How doing nothing got this doctor charged with a crime.
Crane M
Med Econ; 1996 Feb; 73(4):75-6, 78. PubMed ID: 10154691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Reform of forensic autopsy in the German Code of Criminal Procedure].
Parzeller M; Dettmeyer R; Bratzke H
Arch Kriminol; 2010; 225(3-4):73-80. PubMed ID: 20506706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Medicolegal investigation of problems involving criminals and criminal activity.
Eckert WG
Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 1983 Sep; 4(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 6637955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Adolescents in adult court: does the punishment fit the criminal?
Ash P
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 16844793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Comment: DNA as property: implications on the constitutionality of DNA dragnets.
Will JF
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 2003; 65(1):129-43. PubMed ID: 15568272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. I-DNA-fication, personal privacy, and social justice.
Juengst ET
Chic Kent Law Rev; 1999; 75():61-82. PubMed ID: 15732203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. DNA fingerprinting of mosses.
Korpelainen H; Virtanen V
J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jul; 48(4):804-7. PubMed ID: 12877296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reforms in the Criminal Law.
Auld
Med Leg J; 2003; 71(Pt 1):18-28. PubMed ID: 12760323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
