These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17024429)

  • 1. Proactive interference in a two-tone pitch-comparison task without additional interfering tones.
    Ruusuvirta T; Wikgren J; Astikainen P
    Psychol Res; 2008 Jan; 72(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 17024429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proactive interference of a sequence of tones in a two-tone pitch comparison task.
    Ruusuvirta T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Jun; 7(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 10909141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual hysteresis in the judgment of auditory pitch shift.
    Chambers C; Pressnitzer D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jul; 76(5):1271-9. PubMed ID: 24874257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of musical and lexical tones by Taiwanese-speaking musicians.
    Lee CY; Lee YF; Shr CL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):526-35. PubMed ID: 21786918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Referential coding contributes to the horizontal SMARC effect.
    Cho YS; Bae GY; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):726-34. PubMed ID: 22141586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tuning properties of the auditory frequency-shift detectors.
    Demany L; Pressnitzer D; Semal C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1342-8. PubMed ID: 19739748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hear it playing low and slow: how pitch level differentially influences time perception.
    Lake JI; LaBar KS; Meck WH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jun; 149():169-77. PubMed ID: 24746941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On-line perception of Mandarin Tones 2 and 3: evidence from eye movements.
    Shen J; Deutsch D; Rayner K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3016-29. PubMed ID: 23654405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in pitch between tones affect behaviour even when incorrectly identified in direction.
    Ruusuvirta T
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(8):876-9. PubMed ID: 11369410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implicit and explicit statistical learning of tone sequences across spectral shifts.
    Daikoku T; Yatomi Y; Yumoto M
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Oct; 63():194-204. PubMed ID: 25192632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pitch processing of dynamic lexical tones in the auditory cortex is influenced by sensory and extrasensory processes.
    Krishnan A; Gandour JT; Suresh CH
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 May; 41(11):1496-504. PubMed ID: 25943576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cues for lexical tone perception in children: acoustic correlates and phonetic context effects.
    Tong X; McBride C; Burnham D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1589-605. PubMed ID: 24817506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Familiarity and preference for pitch probability profiles.
    Cui AX; Collett MJ; Troje NF; Cuddy LL
    Cogn Process; 2015 May; 16(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 25838257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distributional Learning of Lexical Tones: A Comparison of Attended vs. Unattended Listening.
    Ong JH; Burnham D; Escudero P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0133446. PubMed ID: 26214002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception of pitch height in lexical and musical tones by English-speaking musicians and nonmusicians.
    Lee CY; Lekich A; Zhang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1607-15. PubMed ID: 24606295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of distractor on memory for pitch: trace distortion or interference with retrieval?
    Czachowska-Sieszycka B; Budohoska W
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 1979; 39(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 452959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Source analysis of event-related potentials during pitch discrimination and pitch memory tasks.
    Talja S; Alho K; Rinne T
    Brain Topogr; 2015 May; 28(3):445-58. PubMed ID: 24043402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pitch circularity from tones comprising full harmonic series.
    Deutsch D; Dooley K; Henthorn T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):589-97. PubMed ID: 18647001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Context sensitivity and invariance in perception of octave-ambiguous tones.
    Repp BH; Thompson JM
    Psychol Res; 2010 Sep; 74(5):437-56. PubMed ID: 19941003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.