BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17024497)

  • 1. Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging.
    Fütterer JJ; Engelbrecht MR; Jager GJ; Hartman RP; King BF; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Apr; 17(4):1055-65. PubMed ID: 17024497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Carcinoma of the prostate gland: MR imaging with pelvic phased-array coils versus integrated endorectal--pelvic phased-array coils.
    Hricak H; White S; Vigneron D; Kurhanewicz J; Kosco A; Levin D; Weiss J; Narayan P; Carroll PR
    Radiology; 1994 Dec; 193(3):703-9. PubMed ID: 7972810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of pelvic phased-array versus endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla for local staging of prostate cancer.
    Kim BS; Kim TH; Kwon TG; Yoo ES
    Yonsei Med J; 2012 May; 53(3):550-6. PubMed ID: 22476999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Staging prostate cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced endorectal MR imaging prior to radical prostatectomy: experienced versus less experienced readers.
    Fütterer JJ; Engelbrecht MR; Huisman HJ; Jager GJ; Hulsbergen-van De Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):541-9. PubMed ID: 16244263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fast spin-echo MR images of the pelvis obtained with a phased-array coil: value in localizing and staging prostatic carcinoma.
    Kier R; Wain S; Troiano R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Sep; 161(3):601-6. PubMed ID: 8352116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [MRI staging of prostate cancer with the combined endorectal body phased-array coil and histologic correlation].
    Pegios W; Bentas W; Wittmann L; Mack MG; Zangos S; Söllner O; Binder J; Fellbaum C; Jonas D; Vogl TJ
    Rofo; 2003 Dec; 175(12):1660-6. PubMed ID: 14661137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging.
    Beyersdorff D; Taymoorian K; Knösel T; Schnorr D; Felix R; Hamm B; Bruhn H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Nov; 185(5):1214-20. PubMed ID: 16247137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of using endorectal coil in preoperative staging of rectal carcinomas by pelvic MR imaging.
    Donmez FY; Tunaci M; Yekeler E; Balik E; Tunaci A; Acunas G
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jul; 67(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 17720346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hormonal ablation of prostatic cancer: effects on prostate morphology, tumor detection, and staging by endorectal coil MR imaging.
    Chen M; Hricak H; Kalbhen CL; Kurhanewicz J; Vigneron DB; Weiss JM; Carroll PR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1157-63. PubMed ID: 8615261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging.
    Lee SH; Park KK; Choi KH; Lim BJ; Kim JH; Lee SW; Chung BH
    World J Urol; 2010 Dec; 28(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 20623288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer.
    Park BK; Kim B; Kim CK; Lee HM; Kwon GY
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(4):534-8. PubMed ID: 17882027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [MRI of prostate cancer using three different coil systems: image quality, tumor detection, and staging].
    Beyersdorff D; Darsow U; Stephan C; Schnorr D; Loening S; Taupitz M
    Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 12811693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Local staging of prostatic carcinoma: comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging.
    Presti JC; Hricak H; Narayan PA; Shinohara K; White S; Carroll PR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jan; 166(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 8571856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T--comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance.
    Heijmink SW; Fütterer JJ; Hambrock T; Takahashi S; Scheenen TW; Huisman HJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Knipscheer BC; Kiemeney LA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 17495178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prostate cancer: local staging at 3-T endorectal MR imaging--early experience.
    Fütterer JJ; Heijmink SW; Scheenen TW; Jager GJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
    Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 16304091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: comparison of 11C-choline PET/CT with pelvic multiparametric MR imaging with endorectal coil.
    Kitajima K; Murphy RC; Nathan MA; Froemming AT; Hagen CE; Takahashi N; Kawashima A
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 24434294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of endorectal coils on staging of rectal cancers by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Wong EM; Leung JL; Cheng CS; Lee JC; Li MK; Chung CC
    Hong Kong Med J; 2010 Dec; 16(6):421-6. PubMed ID: 21135417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prostate cancer: accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging--initial results.
    Bloch BN; Furman-Haran E; Helbich TH; Lenkinski RE; Degani H; Kratzik C; Susani M; Haitel A; Jaromi S; Ngo L; Rofsky NM
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):176-85. PubMed ID: 17717328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rectal tumours--MR imaging with endorectal and/or phased-array coils, and histopathological staging on giant sections. A comparative study.
    Blomqvist L; Holm T; Rubio C; Hindmarsh T
    Acta Radiol; 1997 May; 38(3):437-44. PubMed ID: 9191437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate with combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils; Initial experience(1).
    Bloch BN; Rofsky NM; Baroni RH; Marquis RP; Pedrosa I; Lenkinski RE
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):863-7. PubMed ID: 15288036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.