BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17025008)

  • 1. [New editorial advice from the Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics].
    Diesfeldt HF
    Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr; 2006 Sep; 37(4):132-3. PubMed ID: 17025008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The language of the Dutch Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics].
    Goedhard WJ
    Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr; 2003 Dec; 34(6):243-4; author reply 244-5. PubMed ID: 15007955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Misunderstanding of disciplinary decisions].
    Crul BV
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Oct; 142(40):2215. PubMed ID: 9864487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review and the fate of manuscripts.
    Frey JJ
    Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):3. PubMed ID: 3843084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Peer review: is one-eye king?].
    de Jong BC; Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Jan; 137(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 8419837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peering into the review process.
    Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1075-6. PubMed ID: 11101879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The discourteous reviewer.
    Leviton A
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How a submitted manuscript is processed.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Sep; 50(9):853-5; quiz 856. PubMed ID: 19787169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perfecting peer review?
    Nat Med; 2011 Jan; 17(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21217648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Harefuah peer review].
    Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
    Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
    Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
    Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Focus on gerontologic and geriatric research in the Netherlands and Belgium ].
    Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr; 2009 Dec; 40(6):214-5. PubMed ID: 20073269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Peer review for the "Revista de Investigación Clínica].
    Loría A; Lisker R
    Rev Invest Clin; 1994; 46(3):175-6. PubMed ID: 7973139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Innovation, journal reviewers, and journal editors the game is worth the candle.
    Popp RL
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Oct; 46(7):1360-1. PubMed ID: 16198856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [International requirements for preparation of medical journal articles. Advice for beginning authors].
    Spála M
    Sb Lek; 1997; 98(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 9446189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Journalistic rights, and wrongs.
    Mason DJ
    Am J Nurs; 1999 Sep; 99(9):7. PubMed ID: 10489568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The refereed journal: prestige in professional publication.
    Clayton BC; Boyle K
    Nurs Outlook; 1981 Sep; 29(9):531-4. PubMed ID: 6912449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation.
    Falagas ME; Alexiou VG
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2008; 56(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 18661263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.