155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17026691)
1. Identification and classification of skin sensitizers: identifying false positives and false negatives.
Basketter DA; McFadden J; Evans P; Andersen KE; Jowsey I
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Nov; 55(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 17026691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The local lymph node assay: current position in the regulatory classification of skin sensitizing chemicals.
Basketter DA; Gerberick GF; Kimber I
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 18058304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strong irritants masquerading as skin allergens: the case of benzalkonium chloride.
Basketter DA; Marriott M; Gilmour NJ; White IR
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Apr; 50(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 15186375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nothing is perfect, not even the local lymph node assay: a commentary and the implications for REACH.
Basketter DA; McFadden JF; Gerberick F; Cockshott A; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Feb; 60(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 19207375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regulatory classification of substances oxidized to skin sensitizers on exposure to air.
Karlberg AT; Basketter D; Goossens A; Lepoittevin JP
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Apr; 40(4):183-8. PubMed ID: 10208503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays.
Schneider K; Akkan Z
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 39(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15135206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the skin sensitizing potency of chemicals by using the existing methods and considerations of relevance for elicitation.
Basketter DA; Andersen KE; Liden C; Van Loveren H; Boman A; Kimber I; Alanko K; Berggren E
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jan; 52(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 15701129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is the irritant benzalkonium chloride a contact allergen? A contribution to the ongoing debate from a clinical perspective.
Uter W; Lessmann H; Geier J; Schnuch A
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Jun; 58(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 18503686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Information derived from sensitization test methods: test sensitivity, false positives and false negatives.
Basketter DA; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jan; 56(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 17177701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of a detergent on skin response to methyldibromo glutaronitrile in sensitized individuals.
Pedersen LK; Haslund P; Johansen JD; Held E; Vølund A; Agner T
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jan; 50(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15059095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A chemical dataset for evaluation of alternative approaches to skin-sensitization testing.
Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Kern PS; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Patlewicz GY; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):274-88. PubMed ID: 15209809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Classification criteria for skin-sensitizing chemicals: a commentary.
Basketter DA; Flyvholm MA; Menné T
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Apr; 40(4):175-82. PubMed ID: 10208502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Allergic contact dermatitis from methyldibromo glutaronitrile in a sanitary pad and review of Australian clinic data.
Williams JD; Frowen KE; Nixon RL
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Mar; 56(3):164-7. PubMed ID: 17295694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Allergic contact dermatitis due to propylene glycol and parabens in an ultrasonic gel.
Eguino P; Sánchez A; Agesta N; Lasa O; Ratón JA; Díaz-Pérez JL
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 May; 48(5):290. PubMed ID: 12931739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cocamidopropyl betaine a common skin sensitizer in cosmetic products?].
Kanerva L; Estlander T; Leisvaara K; Jolanki R
Duodecim; 1997; 113(4):326-8. PubMed ID: 11370103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the severity of allergic reactions: a regulatory dilemma.
Basketter DA; McFadden JP; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Jul; 67(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 22681462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cocamidopropyl betaine allergy.
Mowad CM
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Dec; 12(4):223-4. PubMed ID: 11753899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preservatives sensitivity in Israel: a 10-year overview (1995-2004).
Zoller L; Bergman R; Weltfriend S
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Oct; 55(4):227-9. PubMed ID: 16958921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Allergic contact dermatitis--formation, structural requirements, and reactivity of skin sensitizers.
Karlberg AT; Bergström MA; Börje A; Luthman K; Nilsson JL
Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Jan; 21(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 18052130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Occupational contact dermatitis to a limonene-based solvent in a histopathology technician.
Foti C; Zambonin CG; Conserva A; Casulli C; D'Accolti L; Angelini G
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Feb; 56(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 17244081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
