301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17027127)
21. An evaluation of clinical and electrophysiologic tests in nerve injury diagnosis after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy.
Teerijoki-Oksa T; Jääskeläinen S; Forssell K; Virtanen A; Forssell H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Feb; 32(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 12653227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In vitro comparison of biomechanical characteristics of sagittal split osteotomy fixation techniques.
Ozden B; Alkan A; Arici S; Erdem E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 35(9):837-41. PubMed ID: 16687240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Response of Schwann cells in the inferior alveolar nerve to distraction osteogenesis: an ultrastructural and immunohistochemical study.
Hu J; Zou S; Tang Z; Wang D; Li J; Gao Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Jun; 32(3):318-24. PubMed ID: 12767881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Experimental study of the influence of mandibular distraction osteogenesis on inferior alveolar nerve function].
Wang X; Wang X; Li Z; Yang Z
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 37(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 11955363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of different fixation methods following sagittal split ramus osteotomies using three-dimensional finite elements analysis. Part 1: advancement surgery-posterior loading.
Erkmen E; Simşek B; Yücel E; Kurt A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 34(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 16053877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Stability of osteosynthesis with bicortical screws placed in a triangular shape in mandibular sagittal split 5 mm advancement osteotomy: biomechanical tests.
Hadi G; Karine BG; Yves C; Pierre L
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Dec; 48(8):624-8. PubMed ID: 20007004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In vitro comparison of screw versus plate fixation in the sagittal split osteotomy.
Foley WL; Beckman TW
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1992; 7(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 1291608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-dimensional finite element analysis used to compare methods of fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: setback surgery-posterior loading.
Erkmen E; Simşek B; Yücel E; Kurt A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Apr; 43(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 15749208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Analysis and comparison of clinical results of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy performed with the use of monocortical locking plate fixation or bicortical screw fixation.
Kabasawa Y; Sato M; Kikuchi T; Sato Y; Takahashi Y; Higuchi Y; Omura K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Nov; 116(5):e333-41. PubMed ID: 22831752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A prospective electromyographic and computer-aided thermal sensitivity assessment of nerve lesions after sagittal split osteotomy and Le Fort I osteotomy.
Schultze-Mosgau S; Krems H; Ott R; Neukam FW
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Feb; 59(2):128-38; discussion 138-9. PubMed ID: 11213980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of lower lip hypoesthesia between hybrid fixation and conventional fixation following sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Ueki K; Moroi A; Ishihara Y; Sotobori M; Iguchi R; Kosaka A; Ikawa H; Yoshizawa K; Marukawa K
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1808-12. PubMed ID: 25048048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment.
Ricard D; Ferri J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Neurosensory alteration in the lower lip and chin area after orthognathic surgery: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus inverted L ramus osteotomy.
Kobayashi A; Yoshimasu H; Kobayashi J; Amagasa T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 May; 64(5):778-84. PubMed ID: 16631484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bicortical vs monocortical orthodontic skeletal anchorage.
Brettin BT; Grosland NM; Qian F; Southard KA; Stuntz TD; Morgan TA; Marshall SD; Southard TE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 18984394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Neurosensory deficits after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible--influence of soft tissue handling medial to the ascending ramus.
Panula K; Finne K; Oikarinen K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Sep; 33(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 15308252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluating function of the inferior alveolar nerve with repeated nerve conduction tests during mandibular sagittal split osteotomy.
Jääskeläinen SK; Peltola JK; Forssell K; Vähätalo K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Mar; 53(3):269-79. PubMed ID: 7861277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of stability of absorbable and titanium plate and screw fixation for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Dolanmaz D; Uckan S; Isik K; Saglam H
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 42(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15013544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Stability of screw fixation following sagittal splitting osteotomy of the mandibular ramus].
Eba M
Meikai Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1990; 19(3):356-76. PubMed ID: 2134896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Facial frontal morphological changes related to mandibular setback osteotomy using cephalograms.
Amano K; Yagi T; Iida S; Aikawa T; Yamashiro T; Takada K; Kogo M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 37(7):412-6. PubMed ID: 19482484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A biomechanical evaluation of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques.
Peterson GP; Haug RH; Van Sickels J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 63(9):1317-24. PubMed ID: 16122596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
