These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17027130)

  • 21. The effect of meniscus compression on the biomechanical properties of repaired meniscal lesions. Winner of the AGA-DonJoy Award 2003.
    Staerke C; Bochwitz C; Groebel KH; Unterhauser F; Becker R
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 May; 124(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 14963723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Force measurements on the posterior oblique ligament and superficial medial collateral ligament proximal and distal divisions to applied loads.
    Griffith CJ; Wijdicks CA; LaPrade RF; Armitage BM; Johansen S; Engebretsen L
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 Jan; 37(1):140-8. PubMed ID: 18725650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The "butterfly" suture technique for meniscal repair.
    Gunes T; Bostan B; Erdem M; Asci M; Sen C; Kelestemur MH
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Mar; 131(3):331-3. PubMed ID: 20617326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A biomechanical study of four different meniscal repair systems, comparing pull-out strengths and gapping under cyclic loading.
    McDermott ID; Richards SW; Hallam P; Tavares S; Lavelle JR; Amis AA
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2003 Jan; 11(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12548447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. MR findings of meniscal extrusion correlated with arthroscopy.
    Magee T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Aug; 28(2):466-70. PubMed ID: 18666195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
    Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biomechanical characterisation of osteosyntheses for proximal femur fractures: helical blade versus screw.
    Al-Munajjed AA; Hammer J; Mayr E; Nerlich M; Lenich A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():1-10. PubMed ID: 18376008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
    Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Trinion meniscal screw.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Jun; 22(6):685.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16762717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Allograft interference screw fixation in meniscus transplantation.
    Farr J; Meneghini RM; Cole BJ
    Arthroscopy; 2004 Mar; 20(3):322-7. PubMed ID: 15007324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A cyclic testing comparison of FasT-Fix and RapidLoc devices in human cadaveric meniscus.
    Nyland J; Chang H; Kocabey Y; Nawab A; Brand J; Caborn DN
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 May; 128(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 18094981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of a short glass fibre-reinforced tube as a model for cat femur for biomechanical testing of orthopaedic implants.
    Gibson TW; Moens NM; Runciman RJ; Holmberg DL
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2008; 21(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 18536844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Compressive loads in longitudinal lateral meniscus tears: a biomechanical study in porcine knees.
    Richards DP; Barber FA; Herbert MA
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Dec; 21(12):1452-6. PubMed ID: 16376234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Time dependent properties of bovine meniscal attachments: stress relaxation and creep.
    Maes JA; Haut Donahue TL
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(16):3055-61. PubMed ID: 16360161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Medial collateral ligament injuries and subsequent load on the anterior cruciate ligament: a biomechanical evaluation in a cadaveric model.
    Battaglia MJ; Lenhoff MW; Ehteshami JR; Lyman S; Provencher MT; Wickiewicz TL; Warren RF
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 19098154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Failure strengths of suture versus biodegradable arrow for meniscal repair: an in vitro study.
    Dervin GF; Downing KJ; Keene GC; McBride DG
    Arthroscopy; 1997 Jun; 13(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 9195024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Meniscal repair devices.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA
    Arthroscopy; 2000 Sep; 16(6):613-8. PubMed ID: 10976122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
    Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bone plug versus suture fixation of the posterior horn in medial meniscalallograft transplantation: a biomechanical study.
    Hunt S; Kaplan K; Ishak C; Kummer FJ; Meislin R
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2008; 66(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 18333824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Biomechanical investigations on chondromalacia of the knee after meniscal flap lesion and partial meniscal resection: an experimental model.
    Grifka JK; Kalteis T; Broll-Zeitvogel E; Philippou S; Plitz W
    J Orthop Res; 2000 May; 18(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 10937625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.