139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17027551)
1. Polished vs rough femoral components in grade A and grade C-2 cement mantles.
Duffy GP; Lozynsky AJ; Harris WH
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Oct; 21(7):1054-63. PubMed ID: 17027551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Challenges in relating experimental hip implant fixation predictions to clinical observations.
Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD; Ebramzadeh E
J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 21040920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of surface finish and of vertical ribs on the stability of a cemented femoral stem: an in vitro stair climbing test.
Jamali AA; Lozynsky AJ; Harris WH
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jan; 21(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 16446196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of femoral stem surface finish on the apparent static shear strength at the stem-cement interface.
Zhang H; Brown LT; Blunt LA; Barrans SM
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Jan; 1(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 19627775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial stability of cemented femoral stems as a function of surface finish, collar, and stem size.
Ebramzadeh E; Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Buhari CF; Dorr LD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jan; 86(1):106-15. PubMed ID: 14711952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cement mantle fatigue failure in total hip replacement: experimental and computational testing.
Jeffers JR; Browne M; Lennon AB; Prendergast PJ; Taylor M
J Biomech; 2007; 40(7):1525-33. PubMed ID: 17070816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surface roughness of debonded straight-tapered stems in cemented THA reduces subsidence but not cement damage.
Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
Biomaterials; 1998 Oct; 19(19):1773-9. PubMed ID: 9856588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro comparison of the effects of rough and polished stem surface finish on pressure generation in cemented hip arthroplasty.
Bartlett GE; Beard DJ; Murray DW; Gill HS
Acta Orthop; 2009 Apr; 80(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 19404793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro influence of stem surface finish and mantle conformity on pressure generation in cemented hip arthroplasty.
Bartlett GE; Gill HS; Murray DW; Beard DJ
Acta Orthop; 2009 Apr; 80(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 19404792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro measurement of interface micromotion and crack in cemented total hip arthroplasty systems with different surface roughness.
Choi D; Park Y; Yoon YS; Masri BA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Jan; 25(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 19744754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A rough surface finish adversely affects the survivorship of a cemented femoral stem.
Della Valle AG; Zoppi A; Peterson MG; Salvati EA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Jul; (436):158-63. PubMed ID: 15995435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of prosthesis surface roughness on the failure process of cemented hip implants after stem-cement debonding.
Verdonschot N; Tanck E; Huiskes R
J Biomed Mater Res; 1998 Dec; 42(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 9827679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of total hip arthroplasty cemented femoral stem surface finish, collar and cement thickness on load transfer to the femur.
Ebramzadeh E; Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Buhari CF; Morrison BJ; Dorr LD
J Appl Biomater Biomech; 2003; 1(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 20803475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of clinical outcomes in total hip arthroplasty using rough and polished cemented stems with essentially the same geometry.
Collis DK; Mohler CG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Apr; 84(4):586-92. PubMed ID: 11940619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acetabular cement mantles and component position: are we achieving "ideal" results?
Sandhu HS; Martin WN; Bishay M; Pozo JL
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):841-5. PubMed ID: 16950036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surface finish mechanics explain different clinical survivorship of cemented femoral stems for total hip arthroplasty.
Beksac B; Taveras NA; Valle AG; Salvati EA
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006; 16(6):407-22. PubMed ID: 17956208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Importance of a thin cement mantle. Autopsy studies of eight hips.
Kawate K; Maloney WJ; Bragdon CR; Biggs SA; Jasty M; Harris WH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):70-6. PubMed ID: 9917592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
