These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17028062)

  • 1. Effects of design flow and treatment level on construction and operation costs of municipal wastewater treatment plants and their implications on policy making.
    Friedler E; Pisanty E
    Water Res; 2006 Dec; 40(20):3751-8. PubMed ID: 17028062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative analysis of methods to represent uncertainty in estimating the cost of constructing wastewater treatment plants.
    Chen HW; Chang NB
    J Environ Manage; 2002 Aug; 65(4):383-409. PubMed ID: 12369402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the costs of collective treatment of wastewater: the case of Walloon Region (Belgium).
    Dogot T; Xanthoulis Y; Fonder N; Xanthoulis D
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(3):640-8. PubMed ID: 20706011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Bayesian method to estimate proportional payments of users in a wastewater treatment plant.
    Gómez-Muñoz VM; Porta-Gándara MA; Gortari JC
    Water Res; 2006 Jan; 40(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 16364400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of public or private structures in wastewater treatment on the conditions for the design, construction and operation of wastewater treatment plants.
    Grünebaum T; Bode H
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):273-80. PubMed ID: 15553486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technical-economical analysis of selected decentralized technologies for municipal wastewater treatment in the city of Rome.
    Gavasci R; Chiavola A; Spizzirri M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(6):1371-8. PubMed ID: 20861552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benchmarking--an approach to efficiency enhancement in planning, construction and operation of wastewater treatment plants.
    Stemplewski J; Schulz A; Schön J
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(2-3):111-7. PubMed ID: 11547973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Realisation of the EU Directive 91/271/EWG in Germany technical and economic effects from the perspective of an operator of large wastewater treatment plants.
    Obenaus F; Kraft A
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):257-63. PubMed ID: 15553484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual wastewater treatment in Flanders (Belgium).
    Van Tomme I; Pieters J; Verstraete W
    Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(3a):205-9. PubMed ID: 15954588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recirculating gravel filters: high-performance treatment at low cost for two small communities.
    Newton C; Wilson JP
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(6):1245-51. PubMed ID: 18845863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. International product cost comparison in the field of water management.
    Bode H; Lemmel P
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(2-3):85-93. PubMed ID: 11548025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Joint operation of small wastewater treatment plants in southern Turkey.
    Sarikaya HZ; Sevimli MF; Koyuncu I; Yuksel E
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(11-12):69-76. PubMed ID: 14753520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benchmarking of large municipal wastewater treatment plants treating over 100,000 PE in Austria.
    Lindtner S; Schaar H; Kroiss H
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(10):1487-93. PubMed ID: 18520003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Upgrading of wastewater treatment plants for nutrient removal under optimal use of existing structures.
    Winkler S; Gasser M; Schättle W; Kremmel D; Kletzmayr P; Matsché N
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(9):1437-43. PubMed ID: 18496010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The cost of a package plant membrane bioreactor.
    Fletcher H; Mackley T; Judd S
    Water Res; 2007 Jun; 41(12):2627-35. PubMed ID: 17467771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Construction and operation costs of constructed wetlands treating wastewater.
    Gkika D; Gikas GD; Tsihrintzis VA
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 70(5):803-10. PubMed ID: 25225926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Towards a "crippled-mode" operation of an industrial wastewater treatment plant.
    Szafnicki K; Narce C
    Water Res; 2006 Feb; 40(3):579-87. PubMed ID: 16405943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Economical and technical efficiencies evaluation of full scale piggery wastewater treatment BNR plants.
    Oa SW; Choi E; Kim SW; Kwon KH; Min KS
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(11):2159-65. PubMed ID: 19494455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Municipal wastewater treatment in Poland - efficiency, costs and returns to scale.
    Berbeka K; Czajkowski M; Markowska A
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 22699345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter-municipal cooperation for wastewater treatment: case studies from Israel.
    Hophmayer-Tokich S; Kliot N
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Feb; 86(3):554-65. PubMed ID: 17335957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.