276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17028353)
1. Sublingual misoprostol compared to artificial rupture of membranes plus oxytocin infusion for labour induction in nulliparous women with a favourable cervix at term.
Lo TK; Lau WL; Wong KS; Tang LC
Hong Kong Med J; 2006 Oct; 12(5):345-50. PubMed ID: 17028353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF 2-HOURLY 20 MCG ORAL MISOPROSTOL SOLUTION COMPARED TO STANDARD INTRAVENOUS OXYTOCIN IN LABOUR INDUCTION DUE TO PRE-LABOUR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM: A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL.
Mbaluka CM; Kamau K; Karanja JG; Mugo N
East Afr Med J; 2014 Sep; 91(9):303-10. PubMed ID: 26866082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sublingual compared with vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term: a randomised controlled trial.
Bartusevicius A; Barcaite E; Krikstolaitis R; Gintautas V; Nadisauskiene R
BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1431-7. PubMed ID: 17083652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Induction of labour in term premature rupture of membranes; oxytocin versus sublingual misoprostol; a randomised clinical trial.
Pourali L; Saghafi N; Eslami Hasan Abadi S; Tara F; Vatanchi AM; Motamedi E
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Feb; 38(2):167-171. PubMed ID: 28784054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women.
Culver J; Strauss RA; Brody S; Dorman K; Timlin S; McMahon MJ
Am J Perinatol; 2004 Apr; 21(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 15085496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.
Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Induction of labor with misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes beyond thirty-six weeks' gestation.
Wing DA; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul; 179(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 9704771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
Alfirevic Z
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (2):CD001338. PubMed ID: 11405987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Induction of labour with a favourable cervix and/or pre-labour rupture of membranes.
Crane JM; Young DC
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Oct; 17(5):795-809. PubMed ID: 12972015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Ham D; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 180(5):1155-60. PubMed ID: 10329871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Titrated low-dose vaginal and/or oral misoprostol to induce labour for prelabour membrane rupture: a randomised trial.
Bricker L; Peden H; Tomlinson AJ; Al-Hussaini TK; Idama T; Candelier C; Luckas M; Furniss H; Davies A; Kumar B; Roberts J; Alfirevic Z
BJOG; 2008 Nov; 115(12):1503-11. PubMed ID: 18752586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Labour characteristics and uterine activity: misoprostol compared with oxytocin in women at term with prelabour rupture of the membranes.
Ngai SW; Chan YM; Lam SW; Lao TT
BJOG; 2000 Feb; 107(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 10688506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The routine use of oxytocin after oral misoprostol for labour induction in women with an unfavourable cervix is not of benefit.
De A; Bagga R; Gopalan S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 46(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 16866794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomised comparison of patient satisfaction with vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for induction of labour at term.
Nassar AH; Awwad J; Khalil AM; Abu-Musa A; Mehio G; Usta IM
BJOG; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1215-21. PubMed ID: 17877674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of efficacy and safety of sublingual misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening in prelabour rupture of membranes after 34 weeks of gestation.
Jha N; Sagili H; Jayalakshmi D; Lakshminarayanan S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jan; 291(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 25055933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
Alfirevic Z
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (4):CD001338. PubMed ID: 11034716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intravaginal misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent.
Fletcher HM; Mitchell S; Simeon D; Frederick J; Brown D
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Jul; 100(7):641-4. PubMed ID: 8369246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sublingual misoprostol with that of vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term.
Sheela CN; John C; Preethi R
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015; 35(5):469-71. PubMed ID: 25358078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-dose vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin plus low-dose vaginal misoprostol for midtrimester labor induction: a randomized trial.
Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Biggio JR; Owen J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1065-70. PubMed ID: 16157113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
