220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1702877)
1. International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. ICPEMC publication No. 19. The classification of carcinogens identified in the rodent bioassay as potential risks to humans: what type of substance should be tested next?
Clayson DB; Arnold DL
Mutat Res; 1991 Jan; 257(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 1702877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. ICPEMC publication No. 17. Can a mechanistic rationale be provided for non-genotoxic carcinogens identified in rodent bioassays?
Clayson DB
Mutat Res; 1989 Jul; 221(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 2664495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. International Commission for Protection against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. ICPEMC working paper No. 5. Genotoxicity tests as predictors of carcinogens: an analysis.
Douglas GR; Blakey DH; Clayson DB
Mutat Res; 1988 Jul; 196(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 3292901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. ICPEMC publication No. 16. Testing for mutagens and carcinogens; the role of short-term genotoxicity assays.
Mutat Res; 1988; 205(1-4):3-12. PubMed ID: 3285192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How many high production chemicals are rodent carcinogens? Why should we care? What do we need to do about it?
Johnson FM
Mutat Res; 2003 Jun; 543(3):201-15. PubMed ID: 12787813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.
Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Classification according to chemical structure, mutagenicity to Salmonella and level of carcinogenicity of a further 42 chemicals tested for carcinogenicity by the U.S. National Toxicology Program.
Ashby J; Tennant RW; Zeiger E; Stasiewicz S
Mutat Res; 1989 Jun; 223(2):73-103. PubMed ID: 2662004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Carcinogenicity categorization of chemicals-new aspects to be considered in a European perspective.
Bolt HM; Foth H; Hengstler JG; Degen GH
Toxicol Lett; 2004 Jun; 151(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 15177638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins.
Kirkland D; Reeve L; Gatehouse D; Vanparys P
Mutat Res; 2011 Mar; 721(1):27-73. PubMed ID: 21238603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short-term tests for defining mutagenic carcinogens.
Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA
IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):499-536. PubMed ID: 10353401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hazard identification: efficiency of short-term tests in identifying germ cell mutagens and putative nongenotoxic carcinogens.
Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA; Bridges BA
Environ Health Perspect; 1993 Oct; 101 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):61-72. PubMed ID: 8143649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Structural implications of the ICPEMC method for quantifying genotoxicity data.
Rosenkranz HS; Klopman G
Mutat Res; 1994 Feb; 305(1):99-116. PubMed ID: 7508550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stratification of rodent carcinogenicity bioassay results to reflect relative human hazard.
Tennant RW
Mutat Res; 1993 Mar; 286(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 7678907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. ICPEMC Working Paper 1/2. A multi-factor ranking scheme for comparing the carcinogenic activity of chemicals.
Nesnow S
Mutat Res; 1990 Sep; 239(2):83-115. PubMed ID: 2385240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mouse-specific carcinogens: an assessment of hazard and significance for validation of short-term carcinogenicity bioassays in transgenic mice.
Battershill JM; Fielder RJ
Hum Exp Toxicol; 1998 Apr; 17(4):193-205. PubMed ID: 9617631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. Approaches to SAR in carcinogenesis and mutagenesis. Prediction of carcinogenicity/mutagenicity using MULTI-CASE.
Klopman G; Rosenkranz HS
Mutat Res; 1994 Feb; 305(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 7508546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The International Commission for Protection against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens (ICPEMC): the first seven years.
Jansen JD
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1984 Jun; 4(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 6739865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rodent carcinogens: setting priorities.
Gold LS; Slone TH; Stern BR; Manley NB; Ames BN
Science; 1992 Oct; 258(5080):261-5. PubMed ID: 1411524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
