These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17028902)

  • 1. A comparison of experimental designs for selection in breeding trials with nested treatment structure.
    Piepho HP; Williams ER
    Theor Appl Genet; 2006 Nov; 113(8):1505-13. PubMed ID: 17028902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Planning incomplete block experiments when treatments are genetically related.
    Bueno Filho JS; Gilmour SG
    Biometrics; 2003 Jun; 59(2):375-81. PubMed ID: 12926722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experimental designs for evaluation of genetic variability and selection of ancient grapevine varieties: a simulation study.
    Gonçalves E; St Aubyn A; Martins A
    Heredity (Edinb); 2010 Jun; 104(6):552-62. PubMed ID: 19904297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic selection models double the accuracy of predicted breeding values for bacterial cold water disease resistance compared to a traditional pedigree-based model in rainbow trout aquaculture.
    Vallejo RL; Leeds TD; Gao G; Parsons JE; Martin KE; Evenhuis JP; Fragomeni BO; Wiens GD; Palti Y
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):17. PubMed ID: 28148220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inter-block information: to recover or not to recover it?
    Möhring J; Williams E; Piepho HP
    Theor Appl Genet; 2015 Aug; 128(8):1541-54. PubMed ID: 25972114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
    Muir WM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Augmented p-rep designs.
    Williams E; Piepho HP; Whitaker D
    Biom J; 2011 Feb; 53(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 21259306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficiency of augmented p-rep designs in multi-environmental trials.
    Moehring J; Williams ER; Piepho HP
    Theor Appl Genet; 2014 May; 127(5):1049-60. PubMed ID: 24553963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficient selection against categorically scored hip dysplasia in dogs is possible using best linear unbiased prediction and optimum contribution selection: a simulation study.
    Malm S; Sørensen AC; Fikse WF; Strandberg E
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2013 Apr; 130(2):154-64. PubMed ID: 23496016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix.
    Hayes BJ; Visscher PM; Goddard ME
    Genet Res (Camb); 2009 Feb; 91(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 19220931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection during a selfing programme. II. The effects of two or more rounds of selection.
    Cornish MA
    Heredity (Edinb); 1990 Oct; 65 ( Pt 2)():213-20. PubMed ID: 2272850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
    Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selection during a selfing programme. I. The effects of a single round of selection.
    Cornish MA
    Heredity (Edinb); 1990 Oct; 65 ( Pt 2)():201-11. PubMed ID: 2272849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of BLUE and BLUP/REML in the selection of clones and families of potato (Solanum tuberosum).
    Ticona-Benavente CA; da Silva Filho DF
    Genet Mol Res; 2015 Dec; 14(4):18421-30. PubMed ID: 26782490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simulation study on the efficiencies of MOET nucleus breeding schemes applying marker assisted selection in dairy cattle.
    Luo W; Wang Y; Zhang Y
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2009 Mar; 52(3):296-306. PubMed ID: 19294355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term selection strategies for complex traits using high-density genetic markers.
    Kemper KE; Bowman PJ; Pryce JE; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4646-56. PubMed ID: 22818479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size determination for three-level randomized clinical trials with randomization at the first or second level.
    Fazzari MJ; Kim MY; Heo M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(3):579-99. PubMed ID: 24697506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Animal model and multiple trait BLUP applied in poultry genetic evaluation].
    Pang H; Wu CX; Zhang Y; Gong GF; Bi YH
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 1989; 16(4):291-8. PubMed ID: 2486251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.