These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17028902)

  • 21. [Animal model and multiple trait BLUP applied in poultry genetic evaluation].
    Pang H; Wu CX; Zhang Y; Gong GF; Bi YH
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 1989; 16(4):291-8. PubMed ID: 2486251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rindsel: an R package for phenotypic and molecular selection indices used in plant breeding.
    Perez-Elizalde S; Cerón-Rojas JJ; Crossa J; Fleury D; Alvarado G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1145():87-96. PubMed ID: 24816662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model.
    Henderson CR
    Biometrics; 1975 Jun; 31(2):423-47. PubMed ID: 1174616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The misuse of BLUP in ecology and evolution.
    Hadfield JD; Wilson AJ; Garant D; Sheldon BC; Kruuk LE
    Am Nat; 2010 Jan; 175(1):116-25. PubMed ID: 19922262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Efficiency of genomic selection in a purebred pig male line.
    Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4164-76. PubMed ID: 22859761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genetic evaluation with major genes and polygenic inheritance when some animals are not genotyped using gene content multiple-trait BLUP.
    Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():89. PubMed ID: 26576649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. EVOLUTIONARY PREDICTABILITY IN NATURAL POPULATIONS: DO MATING SYSTEM AND NONADDITIVE GENETIC VARIANCE INTERACT TO AFFECT HERITABILITIES IN PLANTAGO LANCEOLATA?
    Tonsor SJ; Goodnight CJ
    Evolution; 1997 Dec; 51(6):1773-1784. PubMed ID: 28565103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. LDSO: a program to simulate pedigrees and molecular information under various evolutionary forces.
    Ytournel F; Teyssèdre S; Roldan D; Erbe M; Simianer H; Boichard D; Gilbert H; Druet T; Legarra A
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Oct; 129(5):417-21. PubMed ID: 22963363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Marker-assisted selection reduces expected inbreeding but can result in large effects of hitchhiking.
    Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Jun; 127(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 20536636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection.
    Vitezica ZG; Aguilar I; Misztal I; Legarra A
    Genet Res (Camb); 2011 Oct; 93(5):357-66. PubMed ID: 21767459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Trends in population parameters and best linear unbiased prediction of progeny performance in a European F(2) maize population under modified recurrent full-sib selection.
    Flachenecker C; Frisch M; Falke KC; Melchinger AE
    Theor Appl Genet; 2006 Feb; 112(3):483-91. PubMed ID: 16344984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
    Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. On design considerations and randomization-based inference for community intervention trials.
    Gail MH; Mark SD; Carroll RJ; Green SB; Pee D
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(11):1069-92. PubMed ID: 8804140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.
    Sonesson AK; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 27342705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of selection based on phenotype, selection index and best linear unbiased prediction using data from a closed broiler line.
    Morris AJ; Pollott GE
    Br Poult Sci; 1997 Jul; 38(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 9280349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Genetic response and inbreeding with different selection methods and mating designs for nucleus breeding programs of dairy cattle.
    Leitch HW; Smith C; Burnside EB; Quinton M
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Jun; 77(6):1702-18. PubMed ID: 8083430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genotyping strategies for genomic selection in small dairy cattle populations.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
    Animal; 2012 Aug; 6(8):1216-24. PubMed ID: 23217224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Breeding without breeding.
    El-Kassaby YA; Lstibůrek M
    Genet Res (Camb); 2009 Apr; 91(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 19393127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice.
    Jannink JL; Lorenz AJ; Iwata H
    Brief Funct Genomics; 2010 Mar; 9(2):166-77. PubMed ID: 20156985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for multivariate threshold and continuous data in a simulated horse population using Gibbs sampling and residual maximum likelihood.
    Stock KF; Hoeschele I; Distl O
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Oct; 124(5):308-19. PubMed ID: 17868084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.