These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
45. Application of Pont's Index to a Jordanian population. Al-Omari IK; Duaibis RB; Al-Bitar ZB Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):627-31. PubMed ID: 17971353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Tridimensional cephalometric study of the structural units of the human mandible]. Delachapelle C; Laude M; Thilloy G Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 1981 Sep; 24(3):171-91. PubMed ID: 6948588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Permutation method for evaluating topographic craniofacial correlations. Halazonetis DJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):e211-7. PubMed ID: 21392664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Automated cephalometry: system performance reliability using landmark-dependent criteria. Tanikawa C; Yagi M; Takada K Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19852592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A multi-dimensional orthodontic and prosthodontic study cast analysis. Byland J Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2003; 14(3):9-14. PubMed ID: 14596154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Molar bite force in relation to occlusion, craniofacial dimensions, and head posture in pre-orthodontic children. Sonnesen L; Bakke M Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 15743864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Relationship between sella turcica bridging and cephalometric parameters in adolescents and young adults. Buyuk SK; Karaman A; Yasa Y Oral Radiol; 2019 Sep; 35(3):245-250. PubMed ID: 30484203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of dentoalveolar protrusion values in Moroccans and other populations. Lahlou K; Bahoum A; Makhoukhi MB; Aalloula el H Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):430-4. PubMed ID: 20018796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Compensation for vertical dysplasia and its clinical application. Anwar N; Fida M Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):516-22. PubMed ID: 19679646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Validity and reliability of a new edge-based computerized method for identification of cephalometric landmarks. Kazandjian S; Kiliaridis S; Mavropoulos A Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):619-24. PubMed ID: 16808568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Differences in cephalometric reference values between five centres: relevance to the Eurocleft Study. Trenouth MJ; Laitung G; Naftel AJ Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Feb; 37(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 10203217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A cephalometric study on craniofacial morphology of Iranian children with beta-thalassemia major. Amini F; Jafari A; Eslamian L; Sharifzadeh S Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Feb; 10(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 17284245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Applicability of the Moyers mixed dentition probability tables and new prediction aids for a contemporary population in India. Philip NI; Prabhakar M; Arora D; Chopra S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 20816304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Individual variation in tooth-size/ arch-length changes from the primary to permanent dentitions. Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 16779973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults. Uysal T; Yagci A; Basciftci FA; Sisman Y Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 19482876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Cephalometric norms for the Chinese: a compilation of existing data. Moate SJ; Darendeliler MA Aust Orthod J; 2002 Mar; 18(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 12502125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]