These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17029529)

  • 1. Skeletal characteristics and treatment outcome of five patients with Robin sequence.
    Matsuda A; Suda N; Motohashi N; Tsuji M; Ohyama K
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Sep; 76(5):898-908. PubMed ID: 17029529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Craniofacial morphology of skeletal class III patients before treatment and growth-related changes during treatment with a maxillary protraction appliance: a comparison of orthodontic and surgical cases.
    Murakami C; Hiyama S; Ohyama K
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 15794042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Craniofacial morphology and adolescent facial growth in Pierre Robin sequence.
    Suri S; Ross RB; Tompson BD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jun; 137(6):763-74. PubMed ID: 20685531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orthodontic treatment of a patient with Stickler syndrome.
    Suda N; Handa S; Higashihori N; Ogawa T; Tsuji M; Ohyama K
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):931-9. PubMed ID: 17902239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of a syndromic diagnosis on mandibular size and sagittal position in Robin sequence.
    Rogers GF; Lim AA; Mulliken JB; Padwa BL
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 67(11):2323-31. PubMed ID: 19837298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What skeletal and dental characteristics do TMD patients have in common?
    Phillips JT
    Funct Orthod; 2007; 24(1):24-6, 28, 30. PubMed ID: 17402385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
    Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Stabilized position of incisors after orthodontic treatment on reversed occlusion cases with skeletal imbalance. Application of quadrilateral analysis].
    Morita S; Ishii H; Egami K; Ogura H; Kasai K; Seki H
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jun; 48(3):344-54. PubMed ID: 2637321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Karacay S; Akin E; Olmez H; Gurton AU; Sagdic D
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 16808575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Longitudinal observation of mandibular motion pattern in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion subsequent to orthognathic surgery.
    Wen-Ching Ko E; Huang CS; Lo LJ; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):e158-68. PubMed ID: 22260918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Amiri SS
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A study of Class III treatment: orthodontic camouflage vs orthognathic surgery.
    Georgalis K; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 26999886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between mandibular anterior crowding and lateral dentofacial morphology in the early mixed dentition.
    Türkkahraman H; Sayin MO
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):759-64. PubMed ID: 15673137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of minimal versus conventional presurgical orthodontics in skeletal class III patients treated with two-jaw surgery.
    Joh B; Bayome M; Park JH; Park JU; Kim Y; Kook YA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 71(10):1733-41. PubMed ID: 23932114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
    VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Orthodontic treatment of openbite and deepbite high-angle malocclusions.
    Hering K; Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):470-7. PubMed ID: 10515146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgery-first approach in skeletal class III malocclusion treated with 2-jaw surgery: evaluation of surgical movement and postoperative orthodontic treatment.
    Baek SH; Ahn HW; Kwon YH; Choi JY
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 21(2):332-8. PubMed ID: 20186090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.