149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17029640)
1. Risk-adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in Taiwan: a population-based study.
Tang CH; Wang HI; Hsu CS; Su HW; Chen MJ; Lin HC
BMC Public Health; 2006 Oct; 6():246. PubMed ID: 17029640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data.
DiGiuseppe DL; Aron DC; Payne SM; Snow RJ; Dierker L; Rosenthal GE
Health Serv Res; 2001 Oct; 36(5):959-77. PubMed ID: 11666112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cesarean section in the primigravid.
Mesleh RA; Asiri F; Al-Naim MF
Saudi Med J; 2000 Oct; 21(10):957-9. PubMed ID: 11369962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. When push comes to shove: implementing VBAC practice guidelines.
Coulter CH; Lehrfeld R
Physician Exec; 1995 Jun; 21(6):30-5. PubMed ID: 10161334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reducing cesarean birth rates with data-driven quality improvement activities.
Main EK
Pediatrics; 1999 Jan; 103(1 Suppl E):374-83. PubMed ID: 9917479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis, assessment, and presentation of risk-adjusted statewide obstetrical care data: the StORQS II study in Washington State. Statewide Obstetrics Review and Quality System.
Holubkov R; Holt VL; Connell FA; LoGerfo JP
Health Serv Res; 1998 Aug; 33(3 Pt 1):531-48. PubMed ID: 9685121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Practice patterns during the third stage of labor: the effect of physician age and specialty.
Ely JW; Howser DM; Dawson JD; Bowdler NC; Rijhsinghani A
J Fam Pract; 1996 Dec; 43(6):545-9. PubMed ID: 8969701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Less medicalization of obstetrics in West Frisian islands than on the mainland].
Brouwer WK; van Schie DF
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Dec; 143(52):2616-20. PubMed ID: 10633807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The physician factor in cesarean birth rates.
Goyert GL; Bottoms SF; Treadwell MC; Nehra PC
N Engl J Med; 1989 Mar; 320(11):706-9. PubMed ID: 2922015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Physician perceptions regarding competence of obstetrical providers and attitudes about other issues in obstetrical care.
Cooper CF; Lawler FH
J Okla State Med Assoc; 2001 Dec; 94(12):554-60. PubMed ID: 11775384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are physicians changing the way they practise obstetrics?
Ruderman J; Carroll JC; Reid AJ; Murray MA
CMAJ; 1993 Feb; 148(3):409-15. PubMed ID: 8439912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physicians as patients--the use of obstetric technology in physician families.
Dugowson CE; Holland SK
West J Med; 1987 Apr; 146(4):494-6. PubMed ID: 3577149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Obstetric referral in family practice. Factors Affecting Cesarean Section (FACS) Study Group.
Hueston WJ
J Fam Pract; 1994 Apr; 38(4):368-72. PubMed ID: 8163961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Less medicalization of obstetrics in West Friesian islands than on the mainland].
Kanhai HH
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Feb; 144(9):451-2. PubMed ID: 10719557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Do physicians who diagnose more mental health disorders generate lower health care costs?
Campbell TL; Franks P; Fiscella K; McDaniel SH; Zwanziger J; Mooney C; Sorbero M
J Fam Pract; 2000 Apr; 49(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 10778834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of cesarean section rates in fee-for-service versus managed care patients in the Ohio Medicaid population, 1992-1997.
Koroukian SM; Bush D; Rimm AA
Am J Manag Care; 2001 Feb; 7(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 11216331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing prenatal care in a family practice residency clinic.
Zollinger TW; Saywell RM; Hubbs OA; Lodato MB; Hindahl G; Kelton GM
Fam Med; 1997; 29(10):736-42. PubMed ID: 9397365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Managed care market share and cesarean section rates in the United States: is there a link?
Hueston WJ; Sutton A
Am J Manag Care; 2000 Nov; 6(11):1202-8. PubMed ID: 11185845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing quality of obstetric care for low-risk deliveries; methodological problems in the use of population based mortality data.
Moster D; Markestad T; Lie RT
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Jun; 79(6):478-84. PubMed ID: 10857872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk-adjusted clinical quality indicators: indices for measuring and monitoring rates of mortality, complications, and readmissions.
DesHarnais SI; Forthman MT; Homa-Lowry JM; Wooster LD
Qual Manag Health Care; 2000; 9(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 11185878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
