These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17029653)

  • 1. Evidence-based medicine: classifying the evidence from clinical trials--the need to consider other dimensions.
    Bellomo R; Bagshaw SM
    Crit Care; 2006; 10(5):232. PubMed ID: 17029653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Controlled randomized clinical trials].
    Jaillon P
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2007; 191(4-5):739-56; discussion 756-8. PubMed ID: 18225427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomised controlled trials in orthopaedic surgery and traumatology: overview of parameters and pitfalls.
    Soucacos PN; Johnson EO; Babis G
    Injury; 2008 Jun; 39(6):636-42. PubMed ID: 18533154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to perform a critical analysis of a randomised controlled trial.
    Estellat C; Torgerson DJ; Ravaud P
    Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):291-303. PubMed ID: 19393572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Critical evaluation of clinical trials].
    Gulácsi L; Kiss I
    Orv Hetil; 2004 Dec; 145(51):2575-81. PubMed ID: 15715291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Biomarker-Surrogacy Evaluation Schema: a review of the biomarker-surrogate literature and a proposal for a criterion-based, quantitative, multidimensional hierarchical levels of evidence schema for evaluating the status of biomarkers as surrogate endpoints.
    Lassere MN
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Jun; 17(3):303-40. PubMed ID: 17925313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the evidence: statistical methods in randomized controlled trials in the urological literature.
    Scales CD; Norris RD; Preminger GM; Vieweg J; Peterson BL; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1463-7. PubMed ID: 18710745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of therapeutic trial reports.
    Scott IA; Greenberg PB
    Intern Med J; 2005 Oct; 35(10):611-21. PubMed ID: 16207261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design of randomized controlled trials.
    Stanley K
    Circulation; 2007 Mar; 115(9):1164-9. PubMed ID: 17339574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The need to reform our assessment of evidence from clinical trials: a commentary.
    Bagshaw SM; Bellomo R
    Philos Ethics Humanit Med; 2008 Sep; 3():23. PubMed ID: 18826605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence-based medicine in orthopaedics.
    Barbier O; Hoogmartens M
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2004 Apr; 70(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 15165008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Definition, procedures and goals of evidence-based medicine].
    Häussler B
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2005 Jul; 130 Suppl 2():S66-71. PubMed ID: 15988671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Levels of evidence: how they help in applying study findings to clinical practice.
    Finkelstein A
    J Fam Pract; 2005 Dec; 54(12):1032. PubMed ID: 16321339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Is there a rationale for pluralistic evaluation models? Limitations of randomized clinical trials].
    Kienle GS
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2005; 99(4-5):289-94. PubMed ID: 16044787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Clinical trials: principles of the method].
    Aboulker JP
    Rev Prat; 2000 Apr; 50(8):829-32. PubMed ID: 10874858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new and rapid scoring system to assess the scientific evidence from clinical trials.
    Silber S
    J Interv Cardiol; 2006 Dec; 19(6):485-92. PubMed ID: 17107362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Is an article worthy to be read? Practical guide to the art of critical assessment of a randomized controlled trial].
    Eliasson M
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Dec; 97(50):5897-902. PubMed ID: 11188531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the validity of clinical trials.
    Akobeng AK
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2008 Sep; 47(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18728521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence-based medicine works best when there is evidence: challenges in palliative medicine when randomized controlled trials are not possible.
    Kongsgaard UE; Werner MU
    J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2009; 23(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 19296355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.