260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17029808)
1. Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques.
Kovacs L; Eder M; Hollweck R; Zimmermann A; Settles M; Schneider A; Endlich M; Mueller A; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E
Breast; 2007 Apr; 16(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 17029808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging.
Kovacs L; Eder M; Hollweck R; Zimmermann A; Settles M; Schneider A; Udosic K; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E
Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Dec; 57(6):602-10. PubMed ID: 17122543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Breast volume assessment based on 3D surface geometry: verification of the method using MR imaging].
Eder M; Schneider A; Feussner H; Zimmermann A; Höhnke C; Papadopulos NA; Kovacs L
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Jun; 53(3):112-21. PubMed ID: 18601619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast volumetry using a three-dimensional surface assessment technique.
Koch MC; Adamietz B; Jud SM; Fasching PA; Haeberle L; Karbacher S; Veit K; Schulz-Wendtland R; Uder M; Beckmann MW; Bani MR; Heusinger K; Loehberg CR; Cavallaro A
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):847-55. PubMed ID: 21487916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast volume assessment: comparing five different techniques.
Bulstrode N; Bellamy E; Shrotria S
Breast; 2001 Apr; 10(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 14965570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of volume and shape of breasts: comparison between traditional and three-dimensional techniques.
Eriksen C; Lindgren EN; Olivecrona H; Frisell J; Stark B
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2011 Feb; 45(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 21446795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accurate assessment of breast volume: a study comparing the volumetric gold standard (direct water displacement measurement of mastectomy specimen) with a 3D laser scanning technique.
Yip JM; Mouratova N; Jeffery RM; Veitch DE; Woodman RJ; Dean NR
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Feb; 68(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 21587046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fusion of magnetic resonance and scintimammography images for breast cancer evaluation: a pilot study.
Duarte GM; Cabello C; Torresan RZ; Alvarenga M; Telles GH; Bianchessi ST; Caserta N; Segala SR; de Lima Mda C; Etchebehere EC; Camargo EE; Tinois E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2903-10. PubMed ID: 17632758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Anthropometric 3D-body scanning in idiopathic scoliosis].
Schmitz A; Gäbel H; Weiss HR; Schmitt O
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2002; 140(6):632-6. PubMed ID: 12476386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 2D and multislab 3D magnetic resonance techniques for measuring carotid wall volumes.
Keenan NG; Grasso A; Locca D; Varghese A; Roughton M; Gatehouse PD; Firmin DN; Pennell DJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Dec; 28(6):1476-82. PubMed ID: 19025935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Confocal DNA cytometry: a contour-based segmentation algorithm for automated three-dimensional image segmentation.
Beliën JA; van Ginkel HA; Tekola P; Ploeger LS; Poulin NM; Baak JP; van Diest PJ
Cytometry; 2002 Sep; 49(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 12210606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accelerated bilateral dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D spiral breast MRI using TSENSE.
Han M; Daniel BL; Hargreaves BA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Dec; 28(6):1425-34. PubMed ID: 19025951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of 3-dimensional imaging of the breast region with 3-dimensional laser scanners.
Kovacs L; Yassouridis A; Zimmermann A; Brockmann G; Wöhnl A; Blaschke M; Eder M; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Rosenberg R; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E
Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Mar; 56(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 16508349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visualization, volume and surface area calculation of three dimensional (3D) ultrasound images.
Teferi S
Ethiop Med J; 2007 Oct; 45(4):383-90. PubMed ID: 18326349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional digital evaluation of breast symmetry after breast conservation therapy.
Moyer HR; Carlson GW; Styblo TM; Losken A
J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Aug; 207(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 18656051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new optical method to evaluate three-dimensional volume changes of alveolar contours: a methodological in vitro study.
Windisch SI; Jung RE; Sailer I; Studer SP; Ender A; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):545-51. PubMed ID: 17590160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of body image alteration after renal surgery using a novel three-dimensional laser scanner.
Kobayashi T; Terai A; Yoshimura K; Nishizawa K; Mitsumori K; Ogura K
Urology; 2004 Aug; 64(2):264-8. PubMed ID: 15302475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement.
Ghoddousi H; Edler R; Haers P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17113754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation into variation and errors of a three-dimensional breast imaging system using multiple stereo cameras.
Henseler H; Smith J; Bowman A; Khambay BS; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Dec; 65(12):e332-7. PubMed ID: 22766492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
