BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17029808)

  • 41. Representation of a human head with bi-cubic B-splines technique based on the laser scanning technique in 3D surface anthropometry.
    Zhang B; Molenbroek JF
    Appl Ergon; 2004 Sep; 35(5):459-65. PubMed ID: 15246884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Time-resolved 3D pulmonary perfusion MRI: comparison of different k-space acquisition strategies at 1.5 and 3 T.
    Attenberger UI; Ingrisch M; Dietrich O; Herrmann K; Nikolaou K; Reiser MF; Schönberg SO; Fink C
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):525-31. PubMed ID: 19652608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Application of 3D scanned imaging methodology for volume, surface area, and envelope density evaluation of densified biomass.
    Igathinathane C; Davis JD; Purswell JL; Columbus EP
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jun; 101(11):4220-7. PubMed ID: 20137915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Measurement protocol of women's nude breasts using a 3D scanning technique.
    Lee HY; Hong K; Kim EA
    Appl Ergon; 2004 Jul; 35(4):353-9. PubMed ID: 15159200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of the accuracy and reliability of two 3-dimensional sonography methods in volume measurement of small structures: an in vitro phantom study.
    Kot BC; Sin DM; Ying M
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2009 Feb; 37(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 18803314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Multisegmented tangential breast fields: a rational way to treat breast cancer.
    Gulybán A; Kovács P; Sebestyén Z; Farkas R; Csere T; Karácsonyi G; Dérczy K; Hideghéty K; Esik O
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2008 May; 184(5):262-9. PubMed ID: 18427757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Dosimetric comparison of three different involved nodal irradiation techniques for stage II Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: conventional radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and three-dimensional proton radiotherapy.
    Chera BS; Rodriguez C; Morris CG; Louis D; Yeung D; Li Z; Mendenhall NP
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Nov; 75(4):1173-80. PubMed ID: 19386423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Validation of the Kinect device as a new portable imaging system for three-dimensional breast assessment.
    Henseler H; Kuznetsova A; Vogt P; Rosenhahn B
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Apr; 67(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 24513562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery.
    Tepper OM; Small K; Rudolph L; Choi M; Karp N
    Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):548-51. PubMed ID: 16978973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Preoperative implant selection for two stage breast reconstruction with 3D imaging.
    Szychta P; Raine C; Butterworth M; Stewart K; Witmanowski H; Zadrozny M; Rykala J
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jan; 44():136-43. PubMed ID: 24377697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [3-Dimensional reconstruction of MRI in patients with polyacrylamide hydrogel injection for augmentation mammoplasty].
    Sun JM; Yuan Q; Guo K; Guo NQ; Peng C; Zhang Y; Wang JC
    Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Sep; 24(5):371-3. PubMed ID: 19119640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Use of hand-held laser scanning in the assessment of craniometry.
    Park HK; Chung JW; Kho HS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jul; 160(2-3):200-6. PubMed ID: 16289612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus 3-Dimensional Laser Scanning for Breast Volume Assessment After Breast Reconstruction.
    Howes BH; Watson DI; Fosh B; Yip JM; Kleinig P; Dean NR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Apr; 78(4):455-459. PubMed ID: 28273058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Estimation of breast prosthesis volume by the Cavalieri principle using magnetic resonance images.
    Akbas H; Sahin B; Eroglu L; Odaci E; Bilgic S; Kaplan S; Uzun A; Ergur H; Bek Y
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):275-80. PubMed ID: 15529205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Measurement of breast volume using body scan technology(computer-aided anthropometry).
    Veitch D; Burford K; Dench P; Dean N; Griffin P
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4038-45. PubMed ID: 22317340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Breast asymmetry: a new vision of this malformation.
    Onesti MG; Mezzana P; Martano A; Scuderi N
    Acta Chir Plast; 2004; 46(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 15274471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of rapid volume changes of substrate-adherent cells by conventional microscopy 3D imaging.
    Boudreault F; Grygorczyk R
    J Microsc; 2004 Sep; 215(Pt 3):302-12. PubMed ID: 15312195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Three-dimensional body scanning: a new method to estimate body surface area in neonates.
    Schloesser RL; Lauff M; Buxmann H; Veit K; Fischer D; Allendorf A
    Neonatology; 2011; 100(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 21701216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [3D evaluation and mammary augmentation surgery].
    Garson S; Delay E; Sinna R; Delaporte T; Robbe M; Carton S
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2005 Oct; 50(5):643-51. PubMed ID: 16181717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Acoustic neuroma volume: MRI-based calculations and clinical implications.
    Long SA; Arriaga M; Nelson RA
    Laryngoscope; 1993 Oct; 103(10):1093-6. PubMed ID: 8412443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.