261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17029808)
61. Idiopathic scoliosis and breast asymmetry.
Denoel C; Aguirre MF; Bianco G; Mahaudens PH; Vanwijck R; Garson S; Sinna R; Debrun A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1303-8. PubMed ID: 18701363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging is an Effective Tool for Measuring Breast Volume: A Validation Study.
Lee WY; Kim MJ; Lew DH; Song SY; Lee DW
Arch Plast Surg; 2016 Sep; 43(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 27689050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. [A special software for area and volume measurement and 3D image of skin expander].
Hu H; Chen F; Lu H
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Mar; 16(2):87-9. PubMed ID: 11593626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Preoperative breast volume evaluation of one-stage immediate breast reconstruction using three-dimensional surface imaging and a printed mold.
Chen K; Feng CJ; Ma H; Hsiao FY; Tseng LM; Tsai YF; Lin YS; Huang LY; Yu WC; Perng CK
J Chin Med Assoc; 2019 Sep; 82(9):732-739. PubMed ID: 31335631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. The cost effectiveness of three different measures of breast volume.
Caruso MK; Guillot TS; Nguyen T; Greenway FL
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2006; 30(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 16411159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. The Three-Dimensional Techniques in the Objective Measurement of Breast Aesthetics.
Yang J; Zhang R; Shen J; Hu Y; Lv Q
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 39(6):910-5. PubMed ID: 26395095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast.
Losken A; Seify H; Denson DD; Paredes AA; Carlson GW
Ann Plast Surg; 2005 May; 54(5):471-6; discussion 477-8. PubMed ID: 15838205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Breast and Tumour Volume Measurements in Breast Cancer Patients Using 3-D Automated Breast Volume Scanner Images.
Lagendijk M; Vos EL; Ramlakhan KP; Verhoef C; Koning AHJ; van Lankeren W; Koppert LB
World J Surg; 2018 Jul; 42(7):2087-2093. PubMed ID: 29299647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. 3-D breast anthropometry of plus-sized women in South Africa.
Pandarum R; Yu W; Hunter L
Ergonomics; 2011 Sep; 54(9):866-75. PubMed ID: 21846287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Is three better than two? The use of 3D scanners in the assessment of aesthetic results in local breast cancer treatment.
Cardoso MJ
Breast; 2012 Jun; 21(3):227-8. PubMed ID: 22222069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. [Computer-based preoperative planning for breast reconstruction in the woman with unilateral breast hypoplasia].
Raposio E; Caregnato P; Barabino P; Gualdi A; Orefice A; Spagnolo A; Capello C; Santi PL
Minerva Chir; 2002 Oct; 57(5):711-4. PubMed ID: 12370677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Optimal brassiere wire based on the 3D anthropometric measurements of under breast curve.
Lee HY; Hong K
Appl Ergon; 2007 May; 38(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 16828050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. 3D Breast Volume Estimation.
Gouveia PF; Oliveira HP; Monteiro JP; Teixeira JF; Silva NL; Pinto D; Mavioso C; Anacleto J; Martinho M; Duarte I; Cardoso JS; Cardoso F; Cardoso MJ
Eur Surg Res; 2022; 63(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 34038908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Chances and limitations of a low-cost mobile 3D scanner for breast imaging in comparison to an established 3D photogrammetric system.
Koban KC; Härtnagl F; Titze V; Schenck TL; Giunta RE
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Oct; 71(10):1417-1423. PubMed ID: 29970344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Accurate assessment of breast volume by computed tomography using three-dimensional imaging device.
Fujii T; Yamaguchi S; Yajima R; Tsutsumi S; Asao T; Kuwano H
Am Surg; 2012 Sep; 78(9):933-5. PubMed ID: 22964199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Three-dimensional total synchronous luminescence spectroscopy criteria for discrimination between normal and malignant breast tissues.
Dramićanin T; Dramićanin MD; Jokanović V; Nikolić-Vukosavljević D; Dimitrijević B
Photochem Photobiol; 2005; 81(6):1554-8. PubMed ID: 16149859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Development and assessment of a Microsoft Kinect based system for imaging the breast in three dimensions.
Wheat JS; Choppin S; Goyal A
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jun; 36(6):732-8. PubMed ID: 24507690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. A comparison of experimental and simulated propagators in porous media using confocal laser scanning microscopy, lattice Boltzmann hydrodynamic simulations and nuclear magnetic resonance.
Harris RJ; Sederman AJ; Mantle MD; Crawshaw J; Johns ML
Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Feb; 23(2):355-7. PubMed ID: 15833646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Reliability and Measurement Error of Breast Volume Calculation Using Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging.
Fearn N; Meybodi F; Kilbreath S; Dylke E; Llanos C; Swanton C; Stuart K
Lymphat Res Biol; 2023 Jun; 21(3):296-303. PubMed ID: 36154463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Comparison of analog and digitally evaluated volume of the female breast in reconstructive breast surgery. Validation of a noninvasive measurement method with 3D camera1.
Brebant V; Lemonnier L; Georgieva M; Anker A; Heine N; Seitz S; Frank K; Prantl L; Eigenberger A
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2023; 85(3):277-287. PubMed ID: 36502309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
