235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17030177)
1. Advanced cytologic techniques for the detection of malignant pancreatobiliary strictures.
Moreno Luna LE; Kipp B; Halling KC; Sebo TJ; Kremers WK; Roberts LR; Barr Fritcher EG; Levy MJ; Gores GJ
Gastroenterology; 2006 Oct; 131(4):1064-72. PubMed ID: 17030177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multivariable model using advanced cytologic methods for the evaluation of indeterminate pancreatobiliary strictures.
Fritcher EG; Kipp BR; Halling KC; Oberg TN; Bryant SC; Tarrell RF; Gores GJ; Levy MJ; Clayton AC; Sebo TJ; Roberts LR
Gastroenterology; 2009 Jun; 136(7):2180-6. PubMed ID: 19232347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures.
Smoczynski M; Jablonska A; Matyskiel A; Lakomy J; Dubowik M; Marek I; Biernat W; Limon J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 22078103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An Optimized Set of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Probes for Detection of Pancreatobiliary Tract Cancer in Cytology Brush Samples.
Barr Fritcher EG; Voss JS; Brankley SM; Campion MB; Jenkins SM; Keeney ME; Henry MR; Kerr SM; Chaiteerakij R; Pestova EV; Clayton AC; Zhang J; Roberts LR; Gores GJ; Halling KC; Kipp BR
Gastroenterology; 2015 Dec; 149(7):1813-1824.e1. PubMed ID: 26327129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A multistep cytological approach for patients with jaundice and biliary strictures of indeterminate origin.
Boldorini R; Paganotti A; Andorno S; Orlando S; Mercalli F; Orsello M; Ballarè M; Magnani C; Sartori M
J Clin Pathol; 2015 Apr; 68(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 25681513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective evaluation of advanced molecular markers and imaging techniques in patients with indeterminate bile duct strictures.
Levy MJ; Baron TH; Clayton AC; Enders FB; Gostout CJ; Halling KC; Kipp BR; Petersen BT; Roberts LR; Rumalla A; Sebo TJ; Topazian MD; Wiersema MJ; Gores GJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 May; 103(5):1263-73. PubMed ID: 18477350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Polysomy and p16 deletion by fluorescence in situ hybridization in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures.
Gonda TA; Glick MP; Sethi A; Poneros JM; Palmas W; Iqbal S; Gonzalez S; Nandula SV; Emond JC; Brown RS; Murty VV; Stevens PD
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 22100297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. UroVysion Multi-Target Fluorescence in situ Hybridization Assay for the Detection of Malignant Bile Duct Brushing Specimens: A Comparison with Routine Cytology.
Zhai J
Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 29734171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of fluorescence in situ hybridization in diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma in indeterminate biliary strictures.
Liew ZH; Loh TJ; Lim TKH; Lim TH; Khor CJL; Mesenas SJ; Kong CSC; Ong WC; Tan DMY
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Jan; 33(1):315-319. PubMed ID: 28543841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mutation Profile and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Analyses Increase Detection of Malignancies in Biliary Strictures.
Gonda TA; Viterbo D; Gausman V; Kipp C; Sethi A; Poneros JM; Gress F; Park T; Khan A; Jackson SA; Blauvelt M; Toney N; Finkelstein SD
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jun; 15(6):913-919.e1. PubMed ID: 28017843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlating routine cytology, quantitative nuclear morphometry by digital image analysis, and genetic alterations by fluorescence in situ hybridization to assess the sensitivity of cytology for detecting pancreatobiliary tract malignancy.
Barr Fritcher EG; Kipp BR; Slezak JM; Moreno-Luna LE; Gores GJ; Levy MJ; Roberts LR; Halling KC; Sebo TJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Aug; 128(2):272-9. PubMed ID: 17638662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.
Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. FISHing for pancreatobiliary tract malignancy in endoscopic brushings enhances the sensitivity of routine cytology.
Barr Fritcher EG; Kipp BR; Halling KC; Clayton AC
Cytopathology; 2014 Oct; 25(5):288-301. PubMed ID: 25073411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved diagnostic yield of endoscopic biliary brush cytology by digital image analysis.
Rumalla A; Baron TH; Leontovich O; Burgart LJ; Yacavone RF; Therneau TM; de Groen PC; Sebo TJ
Mayo Clin Proc; 2001 Jan; 76(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 11155409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Advanced cytologic approaches for the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary cancer.
Fritcher EG; Halling KC
Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2010 May; 26(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 20393279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of KRAS mutation analysis and FISH for detecting pancreatobiliary tract cancer in cytology specimens collected during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Kipp BR; Fritcher EG; Clayton AC; Gores GJ; Roberts LR; Zhang J; Levy MJ; Halling KC
J Mol Diagn; 2010 Nov; 12(6):780-6. PubMed ID: 20864634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization, Cholangioscopic Biopsies, and EUS-FNA in the Evaluation of Biliary Strictures.
Brooks C; Gausman V; Kokoy-Mondragon C; Munot K; Amin SP; Desai A; Kipp C; Poneros J; Sethi A; Gress FG; Kahaleh M; Murty VV; Sharaiha R; Gonda TA
Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Mar; 63(3):636-644. PubMed ID: 29353443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Glasbrenner B; Ardan M; Boeck W; Preclik G; Möller P; Adler G
Endoscopy; 1999 Nov; 31(9):712-7. PubMed ID: 10604612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving the accuracy of pancreatobiliary tract cytology with fluorescence in situ hybridization: a molecular test with proven clinical success.
Kipp BR; Barr Fritcher EG; Pettengill JE; Halling KC; Clayton AC
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Nov; 121(11):610-9. PubMed ID: 23633236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preliminary experience comparing routine cytology results with the composite results of digital image analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization in patients undergoing EUS-guided FNA.
Levy MJ; Clain JE; Clayton A; Halling KC; Kipp BR; Rajan E; Roberts LR; Root RM; Sebo TJ; Topazian MD; Wang KK; Wiersema MJ; Gores GJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Sep; 66(3):483-90. PubMed ID: 17725938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
