236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17030177)
41. Endoscopic retrograde wire-guided brush cytology for diagnosis of patients with malignant obstruction of the bile duct.
Foutch PG; Kerr DM; Harlan JR; Manne RK; Kummet TD; Sanowski RA
Am J Gastroenterol; 1990 Jul; 85(7):791-5. PubMed ID: 2164768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration with fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis in 104 patients with pancreatic mass.
Ribeiro A; Peng J; Casas C; Fan YS
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Aug; 29(8):1654-8. PubMed ID: 24628622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Analysis of false-negative diagnoses on endoscopic brush cytology of biliary and pancreatic duct strictures: the experience at 2 university hospitals.
Logrono R; Kurtycz DF; Molina CP; Trivedi VA; Wong JY; Block KP
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Mar; 124(3):387-92. PubMed ID: 10705391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. An assessment of chromosomal alterations detected by fluorescence in situ hybridisation in pancreatobiliary tract malignancy.
Pu X; Zheng H; Yang X; Ye Q; Fan Z; Yang J; Fan X; Zhou X; Qiu Y; Huang Q; Wu H; Chen J
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Nov; 20(1):367. PubMed ID: 33148183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Contribution of nuclear morphometry by confocal laser scanning microscopy to the diagnosis of malignant bile duct strictures.
Papaxoinis K; Patsouris E; Athanassiadou P; Nicolopoulou-Stamati P
Acta Cytol; 2009; 53(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 19365964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison between endoscopic brush cytology performed before and after biliary stricture dilation for cancer detection.
Ornellas LC; Santos Gda C; Nakao FS; Ferrari AP
Arq Gastroenterol; 2006; 43(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 16699613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Endoscopic retrograde wire-guided cytology of malignant biliary strictures using a novel scraping brush.
Parasher VK; Huibregtse K
Gastrointest Endosc; 1998 Sep; 48(3):288-90. PubMed ID: 9744607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. EUS-FNA with rescue fluorescence in situ hybridization for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma in patients with inconclusive on-site cytopathology results.
Kubiliun N; Ribeiro A; Fan YS; Rocha-Lima CM; Sleeman D; Merchan J; Barkin J; Levi J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Sep; 74(3):541-7. PubMed ID: 21752364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Diagnostic and prognostic implications of DNA ploidy and S-phase evaluation in the assessment of malignancy in biliary strictures.
Lindberg B; Enochsson L; Tribukait B; Arnelo U; Bergquist A
Endoscopy; 2006 Jun; 38(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 16802266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Scraping cytology with a guidewire for pancreatic-ductal strictures.
Uehara H; Tatsumi K; Masuda E; Kato M; Kizu T; Ishida T; Takakura R; Takano Y; Nakaizumi A; Ishikawa O; Takenaka A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Jul; 70(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 19249043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Modern diagnostic approaches to cholangiocarcinoma.
Vasilieva LE; Papadhimitriou SI; Dourakis SP
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2012 Aug; 11(4):349-59. PubMed ID: 22893461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Fluorescence in situ hybridization as adjunct to cytology improves the diagnosis and directs estimation of prognosis of malignant pleural effusions.
Han J; Cao S; Zhang K; Zhao G; Xin Y; Dong Q; Yan Y; Cui J
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Nov; 7():121. PubMed ID: 23148562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Immunocytochemistry for Claudin-18 and Maspin in biliary brushing cytology increases the accuracy of diagnosing pancreatobiliary malignancies.
Tokumitsu T; Sato Y; Yamashita A; Moriguchi-Goto S; Kondo K; Nanashima A; Asada Y
Cytopathology; 2017 Apr; 28(2):116-121. PubMed ID: 27527114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Next-Generation Sequencing and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Have Comparable Performance Characteristics in the Analysis of Pancreaticobiliary Brushings for Malignancy.
Dudley JC; Zheng Z; McDonald T; Le LP; Dias-Santagata D; Borger D; Batten J; Vernovsky K; Sweeney B; Arpin RN; Brugge WR; Forcione DG; Pitman MB; Iafrate AJ
J Mol Diagn; 2016 Jan; 18(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 26596524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Brush cytology of the extrahepatic biliary tract: comparison of cytologic features of adenocarcinoma and benign biliary strictures.
Cohen MB; Wittchow RJ; Johlin FC; Bottles K; Raab SS
Mod Pathol; 1995 Jun; 8(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 7675767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Usefulness of brush cytology combined with pancreatic juice cytology in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: significance of pancreatic juice cytology after brushing.
Yamaguchi T; Shirai Y; Nakamura N; Sudo K; Nakamura K; Hironaka S; Hara T; Denda T
Pancreas; 2012 Nov; 41(8):1225-9. PubMed ID: 23086246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Efficacy of endoscopic wire guided biliary brushing in the evaluation of biliary strictures.
Sachdev A; Duseja A; Bhalla A; Handa U; Sandhu BS; Gupta V; Kochhar S
Trop Gastroenterol; 2003; 24(4):215-7. PubMed ID: 15164539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Combined brush cytology and stent placement in a single session for presumed malignant biliary stricture.
Kawada N; Uehara H; Katayama K; Takano Y; Takakura R; Imanaka K; Ohkawa K; Takenaka A; Ishikawa O
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Aug; 26(8):1247-51. PubMed ID: 21443662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. DNA image analysis combined with routine cytology improves diagnostic sensitivity of common bile duct brushing.
Krishnamurthy S; Katz RL; Shumate A; Strohlein K; Khanna A; Tucker SL; Raijman I; Lahoti S
Cancer; 2001 Jun; 93(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 11391612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Biliary brush cytology for the diagnosis of malignancy: a single center experience.
Stoos-Veić T; Bilić B; Kaić G; Ostović KT; Babić Z; Kujundzić M
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 20432742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
