BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17030370)

  • 1. The use of myocardial and testicular end points as a basis for estimating a proposed tolerable daily intake for sodium monofluoroacetate (1080).
    Foronda NM; Fowles J; Smith N; Taylor M; Temple W; Darlington C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Feb; 47(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 17030370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A benchmark dose analysis for sodium monofluoroacetate (1080) using dichotomous toxicity data.
    Foronda NM; Fowles J; Smith N; Taylor M; Temple W
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Feb; 47(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 16965845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Background to the ADI/TDI/PTWI.
    Herrman JL; Younes M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Oct; 30(2 Pt 2):S109-13. PubMed ID: 10597623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bootstrap estimation of benchmark doses and confidence limits with clustered quantal data.
    Zhu Y; Wang T; Jelsovsky JZ
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 17511711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Precision of estimates of an ADI (or TDI or PTWI).
    Speijers GJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Oct; 30(2 Pt 2):S87-93. PubMed ID: 10597619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The benchmark dose method--review of available models, and recommendations for application in health risk assessment.
    Filipsson AF; Sand S; Nilsson J; Victorin K
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2003; 33(5):505-42. PubMed ID: 14594105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deriving a data-based interspecies assessment factor using the NOAEL and the benchmark dose approach.
    Bokkers BG; Slob W
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2007 Jun; 37(5):355-73. PubMed ID: 17612951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The current state of knowledge on the use of the benchmark dose concept in risk assessment.
    Sand S; Victorin K; Filipsson AF
    J Appl Toxicol; 2008 May; 28(4):405-21. PubMed ID: 17879232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toxicity value for 3-monochloropropane-1,2-diol using a benchmark dose methodology.
    Hwang M; Yoon E; Kim J; Jang DD; Yoo TM
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Mar; 53(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 19133308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Principles of risk assessment for determining the safety of chemicals: recent assessment of residual solvents in drugs and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.
    Hasegawa R; Koizumi M; Hirose A
    Congenit Anom (Kyoto); 2004 Jun; 44(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 15198717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Procedures for calculating benchmark doses for health risk assessment.
    Gaylor D; Ryan L; Krewski D; Zhu Y
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Oct; 28(2):150-64. PubMed ID: 9927564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of an occupational exposure limit for n-propylbromide using benchmark dose methods.
    Stelljes ME; Wood RR
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Oct; 40(2):136-50. PubMed ID: 15450717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toxicological analysis points to a lower tolerable daily intake of melamine in food.
    Hsieh DP; Chiang CF; Chiang PH; Wen CP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Oct; 55(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 19486917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of an additional safety or uncertainty factor for nature of toxicity in the estimation of acceptable daily intake and tolerable daily intake values.
    Renwick AG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Dec; 22(3):250-61. PubMed ID: 8837849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incidence and severity in relation to magnitude of intake above the ADI or TDI: use of critical effect data.
    Renwick AG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Oct; 30(2 Pt 2):S79-86. PubMed ID: 10597618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A procedure for developing risk-based reference doses.
    Gaylor DW; Kodell RL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Apr; 35(2 Pt 1):137-41. PubMed ID: 12051999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The benchmark dose approach in food risk assessment: is it applicable and worthwhile?
    Muri SD; Schlatter JR; Brüschweiler BJ
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2009 Dec; 47(12):2906-25. PubMed ID: 19682530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relation between benchmark dose and no-observed-adverse-effect level in clinical research: effects of daily alcohol intake on blood pressure in Japanese salesmen.
    Dakeishi M; Murata K; Tamura A; Iwata T
    Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 16492185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of benchmark dose and meta-analysis to determine the most sensitive endpoint for risk assessment for dimethoate.
    Reiss R; Gaylor D
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Oct; 43(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 16099569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety assessment of boron by application of new uncertainty factors and their subdivision.
    Hasegawa R; Hirata-Koizumi M; Dourson ML; Parker A; Ono A; Hirose A
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Feb; 65(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 23137930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.