186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17030888)
1. The effects of a parenting prime on sex differences in mate selection criteria.
Millar MG; Ostlund NM
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1459-68. PubMed ID: 17030888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The mere presence of opposite-sex others on judgments of sexual and romantic desirability: opposite effects for men and women.
Hill SE; Buss DM
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 May; 34(5):635-47. PubMed ID: 18303129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sex differences in subjective distress to unfaithfulness: testing competing evolutionary and violation of infidelity expectations hypotheses.
Cramer RE; Lipinski RE; Meteer JD; Houska JA
J Soc Psychol; 2008 Aug; 148(4):389-405. PubMed ID: 18807418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The best men are (not always) already taken: female preference for single versus attached males depends on conception risk.
Bressan P; Stranieri D
Psychol Sci; 2008 Feb; 19(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 18271862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of humor on interpersonal attraction and mate selection.
McGee E; Shevlin M
J Psychol; 2009 Jan; 143(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 19157073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs.
Li NP; Bailey JM; Kenrick DT; Linsenmeier JA
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Jun; 82(6):947-55. PubMed ID: 12051582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?
Eastwick PW; Finkel EJ
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Feb; 94(2):245-64. PubMed ID: 18211175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The siren's call: terror management and the threat of men's sexual attraction to women.
Landau MJ; Goldenberg JL; Greenberg J; Gillath O; Solomon S; Cox C; Martens A; Pyszczynski T
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Jan; 90(1):129-46. PubMed ID: 16448314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mate choice decisions: the role of facial beauty.
Johnston VS
Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Jan; 10(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 16311066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evolutionary perspective on humor: sexual selection or interest indication?
Li NP; Griskevicius V; Durante KM; Jonason PK; Pasisz DJ; Aumer K
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jul; 35(7):923-36. PubMed ID: 19407005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Individual differences in valuing mates' physical attractiveness.
Mathes EW; Bielser A; Cassell T; Summers S; Witowski A
Psychol Rep; 2006 Oct; 99(2):502-11. PubMed ID: 17153821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gazing behavior during mixed-sex interactions: sex and attractiveness effects.
van Straaten I; Holland RW; Finkenauer C; Hollenstein T; Engels RC
Arch Sex Behav; 2010 Oct; 39(5):1055-62. PubMed ID: 19263209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using revealed mate preferences to evaluate market force and differential preference explanations for mate selection.
Wood D; Brumbaugh CC
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 96(6):1226-44. PubMed ID: 19469598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: an examination of biological and cultural influences.
Lippa RA
Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Apr; 36(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 17380374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Meeting your match: how attractiveness similarity affects approach behavior in mixed-sex dyads.
van Straaten I; Engels RC; Finkenauer C; Holland RW
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jun; 35(6):685-97. PubMed ID: 19336540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age and gender differences in sexual behavior preferences: a follow-up report.
Purnine DM; Carey MP
J Sex Marital Ther; 1998; 24(2):93-102. PubMed ID: 9611689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of relationship status, mate seeking, and sex on intrasexual competition.
Fisher ML; Tran US; Voracek M
J Soc Psychol; 2008 Aug; 148(4):493-508. PubMed ID: 18807423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The big, the rich, and the powerful: physical, financial, and social dimensions of dominance in mating and attraction.
Bryan AD; Webster GD; Mahaffey AL
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Mar; 37(3):365-82. PubMed ID: 21252382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.
Li NP; Yong JC; Tov W; Sng O; Fletcher GJ; Valentine KA; Jiang YF; Balliet D
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):757-76. PubMed ID: 23915041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mate retention behavior of men and women in heterosexual and homosexual relationships.
Vanderlaan DP; Vasey PL
Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Aug; 37(4):572-85. PubMed ID: 17216358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
