162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17031836)
1. Strengths and weaknesses of dark-lumen MR colonography: clinical relevance of polyps smaller than 5 mm in diameter at the moment of their detection.
Ajaj W; Ruehm SG; Gerken G; Goyen M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(5):1088-94. PubMed ID: 17031836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dark lumen MR colonography: can high spatial resolution VIBE imaging improve the detection of colorectal masses?
Ajaj W; Rühm SG; Papanikolaou N; Lauenstein TC; Gerken G; Goyen M
Rofo; 2006 Nov; 178(11):1073-8. PubMed ID: 17128377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy.
Hartmann D; Bassler B; Schilling D; Adamek HE; Jakobs R; Pfeifer B; Eickhoff A; Zindel C; Riemann JF; Layer G
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 16304088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dark lumen MR-colonography: initial experience.
Lauenstein TC; Herborn CU; Vogt FM; Göhde SC; Debatin JF; Ruehm SG
Rofo; 2001 Sep; 173(9):785-9. PubMed ID: 11582556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of magnetic resonance colonography at 3.0 Tesla regarding diagnostic accuracy and image quality.
Saar B; Gschossmann JM; Bonel HM; Kickuth R; Vock P; Netzer P
Invest Radiol; 2008 Aug; 43(8):580-6. PubMed ID: 18648258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening of colonic tumors by air-inflated magnetic resonance (MR) colonography.
Lam WW; Leung WK; Wu JK; So NM; Sung JJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Apr; 19(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 15065168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR colonography: how does air compare to water for colonic distention?
Ajaj W; Lauenstein TC; Pelster G; Goehde SC; Debatin JF; Ruehm SG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Feb; 19(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 14745756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intravenous, contrast-enhanced MR colonography using air as endoluminal contrast agent: impact on colorectal polyp detection.
Keeling AN; Morrin MM; McKenzie C; Farrell RJ; Sheth SG; Ngo L; Bloch BN; Pedrosa I; Rofsky NM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 21131152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital subtraction dark-lumen MR colonography: initial experience.
Ajaj W; Veit P; Kuehle C; Joekel M; Lauenstein TC; Herborn CU
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jun; 21(6):841-4. PubMed ID: 15906327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MR colonography for the assessment of colonic anastomoses.
Ajaj W; Goyen M; Langhorst J; Ruehm SG; Gerken G; Lauenstein TC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 16736477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parallel imaging enhanced MR colonography using a phantom model.
Morrin MM; Pedrosa I; McKenzie CA; Farrell RJ; Bloch N; Solazzo S; Ngo L; Goldberg SN; Rofsky NM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):664-72. PubMed ID: 18777549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance.
Goehde SC; Descher E; Boekstegers A; Lauenstein T; Kühle C; Ruehm SG; Ajaj W
Abdom Imaging; 2005; 30(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 15759203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Air-inflated magnetic resonance colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy: Comparison with intraoperative findings, pathology specimens, and follow-up conventional colonoscopy.
Wong TY; Lam WW; So NM; Lee JF; Leung KL
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Jan; 102(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 17100979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The sensitivity of MR colonography using dark lumen technique for detection of colonic lesions.
Acay MB; Bayramoğlu S; Acay A
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jun; 25(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 25141315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results.
Pinker K; Grabner G; Bogner W; Gruber S; Szomolanyi P; Trattnig S; Heinz-Peer G; Weber M; Fitzal F; Pluschnig U; Rudas M; Helbich T
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):553-8. PubMed ID: 19652611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visualization of the biliary tract using gadobenate dimeglumine: preliminary findings.
Ergen FB; Akata D; Sarikaya B; Kerimoglu U; Hayran M; Akhan O; Hussain HK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 18303288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance colonography versus colonoscopy as a diagnostic investigation for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Purkayastha S; Tekkis PP; Athanasiou T; Aziz O; Negus R; Gedroyc W; Darzi AW
Clin Radiol; 2005 Sep; 60(9):980-9. PubMed ID: 16124980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [MR-colonography in hospitalized patients: feasibility and sensitivity].
Kerker J; Albes G; Roer N; Montag M; Budde T; Schaefer A
Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Apr; 46(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 18393151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR colonoscopy at 3.0 T: comparison with 1.5 T in vivo and a colon model.
Röttgen R; Herzog H; Bogen P; Freund T; Felix R; Bruhn H
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 16814140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of colonic masses with MR colonography.
Haykir R; Karaköse S; Karabacakoğlu A; Kayaçetin E; Sahin M
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2006 Sep; 17(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16941252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
