BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17032322)

  • 1. A single common urgent pathway for all colorectal referrals reduces time to diagnosis and treatment.
    Scott MA; Knight A; Brown K; Novell JR
    Colorectal Dis; 2006 Nov; 8(9):766-71. PubMed ID: 17032322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Referral guidelines for colorectal cancer--do they work?
    Eccersley AJ; Wilson EM; Makris A; Novell JR
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2003 Mar; 85(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 12648341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stage, survival and delays in lung, colorectal, prostate and ovarian cancer: comparison between diagnostic routes.
    Neal RD; Allgar VL; Ali N; Leese B; Heywood P; Proctor G; Evans J
    Br J Gen Pract; 2007 Mar; 57(536):212-9. PubMed ID: 17359608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-week rule: has prioritisation of breast referrals by general practitioners improved?
    Imkampe A; Bendall S; Chianakwalam C
    Breast; 2006 Oct; 15(5):654-8. PubMed ID: 16580206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How has the 'two-week wait' rule affected the presentation of colorectal cancer?
    Chohan DP; Goodwin K; Wilkinson S; Miller R; Hall NR
    Colorectal Dis; 2005 Sep; 7(5):450-3. PubMed ID: 16108880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using clinical audit, qualitative data from patients and feedback from general practitioners to decrease delay in the referral of suspected colorectal cancer.
    Davies E; van der Molen B; Cranston A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Apr; 13(2):310-7. PubMed ID: 17378881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes for patients referred urgently with suspected head and neck cancer.
    Hobson JC; Malla JV; Sinha J; Kay NJ; Ramamurthy L
    J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Nov; 122(11):1241-4. PubMed ID: 18371234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Straight to colonoscopy: the ideal patient pathway for the 2-week suspected cancer referrals?
    Beggs AD; Bhate RD; Irukulla S; Achiek M; Abulafi AM
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2011 Mar; 93(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 21073821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Referral of suspected colorectal cancer: have guidelines made a difference?
    Jiwa M; Hamilton W
    Br J Gen Pract; 2004 Aug; 54(505):608-10. PubMed ID: 15296561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Under utilisation of the 2-week wait initiative for lung cancer by primary care and its effect on the urgent referral pathway.
    Lewis NR; Le Jeune I; Baldwin DR
    Br J Cancer; 2005 Oct; 93(8):905-8. PubMed ID: 16189521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A study on the routes of referral for patients with colorectal cancer and its affect on the time to surgery and pathological stage.
    Trickett JP; Donaldson DR; Bearn PE; Scott HJ; Hassall AC
    Colorectal Dis; 2004 Nov; 6(6):428-31. PubMed ID: 15521930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effectiveness of the '2-week wait' referral service for colorectal cancer.
    Leung E; Grainger J; Bandla N; Wong L
    Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Nov; 64(12):1671-4. PubMed ID: 20946272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Straight-to-test for the two-week-wait colorectal cancer pathway under the updated NICE guidelines reduces time to cancer diagnosis and treatment.
    Christopher J; Flint TR; Ahmed H; Dhir N; Li R; Macfarland K; Ng D; Ng J; O'Neill C; Te Water Naudé A; Sloan K; Hall NR; Powar MP
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2019 May; 101(5):333-339. PubMed ID: 31042431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of a rapid referral pathway for suspected colorectal cancer in Madrid.
    Valentín-López B; Ferrándiz-Santos J; Blasco-Amaro JA; Morillas-Sáinz JD; Ruiz-López P
    Fam Pract; 2012 Apr; 29(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 21976660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repeat 2-week wait referrals for colorectal cancer.
    Vaughan-Shaw PG; Cutting JE; Borley NR; Wheeler JM
    Colorectal Dis; 2013 Mar; 15(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 22776207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audit of acute referrals to the Department of Dermatology at Waikato Hospital: comparison with national access criteria for first specialist appointment.
    Stanway A; Oakley A; Rademaker M; Duffill M
    N Z Med J; 2004 Apr; 117(1192):U849. PubMed ID: 15107871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of the '2 week wait' directive for suspected cancer on service provision in a symptomatic breast clinic.
    Cant PJ; Yu DS
    Br J Surg; 2000 Aug; 87(8):1082-6. PubMed ID: 10931055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Straight to test: introduction of a city-wide protocol driven investigation of suspected colorectal cancer.
    Hemingway DM; Jameson J; Kelly MJ;
    Colorectal Dis; 2006 May; 8(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 16630232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Has the breast cancer 'two week wait' guarantee for assessment made any difference?
    Khawaja AR; Allan SM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2000 Sep; 26(6):536-9. PubMed ID: 11034802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective audit of the implementation of the 2-week rule for assessment of suspected urological cancers.
    Coxon JP; Harris HJ; Watkin NA
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2003 Sep; 85(5):347-50. PubMed ID: 14594541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.