227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17032323)
21. The role of MRI pelvimetry in predicting technical difficulty and outcomes of open and minimally invasive total mesorectal excision: a systematic review.
Hong JS; Brown KGM; Waller J; Young CJ; Solomon MJ
Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Oct; 24(10):991-1000. PubMed ID: 32623536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Thin-section MRI with a phased-array coil for preoperative evaluation of pelvic anatomy and tumor extent in patients with rectal cancer.
Akasu T; Iinuma G; Fujita T; Muramatsu Y; Tateishi U; Miyakawa K; Murakami T; Moriyama N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):531-8. PubMed ID: 15671375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Computed tomographic pelvimetry in German shepherd dogs.
Ocal MK; Dabanoglu I; Kara ME; Turan E
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2003 Jan; 110(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 12596666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. MR obstetric pelvimetry: effect of birthing position on pelvic bony dimensions.
Michel SC; Rake A; Treiber K; Seifert B; Chaoui R; Huch R; Marincek B; Kubik-Huch RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Oct; 179(4):1063-7. PubMed ID: 12239066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer in clinical practice: high accuracy in predicting circumferential margin with clinical benefit.
Videhult P; Smedh K; Lundin P; Kraaz W
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Jun; 9(5):412-9. PubMed ID: 17504337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Variations in pelvic dimensions do not predict the risk of circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement in rectal cancer.
Salerno G; Daniels IR; Brown G; Norman AR; Moran BJ; Heald RJ
World J Surg; 2007 Jun; 31(6):1313-20. PubMed ID: 17468974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of pelvic dimensions on anastomotic leak after anterior resection for patients with rectal cancer.
Yu ZL; Liu XH; Liu HS; Ke J; Zou YF; Cao WT; Xiao J; Zhou ZY; Lan P; Wu XJ; Wu XR
Surg Endosc; 2021 May; 35(5):2134-2143. PubMed ID: 32410082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Analysis of normal pelvis morphometry of modern Chinese southern Han female and its correlation with age].
Liu P; Yu YH; Chen CL; Tang YX; Wang L; Mao DR; Xu YK; Chen L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 48(7):481-5. PubMed ID: 24284215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer can overcome difficulties associated with pelvic anatomy.
Baek SJ; Kim CH; Cho MS; Bae SU; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
Surg Endosc; 2015 Jun; 29(6):1419-24. PubMed ID: 25159651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison between the oncologic outcome of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for T1 and T2 rectosigmoidal and rectal carcinoma: matched case-control study.
Nakamura T; Kokuba Y; Mitomi H; Onozato W; Hatate K; Satoh T; Ozawa H; Ihara A; Watanabe M
Hepatogastroenterology; 2007 Jun; 54(76):1094-7. PubMed ID: 17629046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Size matters--in rectal cancer.
Colorectal Dis; 2005 May; 7(3):203. PubMed ID: 15859954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging-detected extramural vascular invasion in rectal cancer.
Smith NJ; Barbachano Y; Norman AR; Swift RI; Abulafi AM; Brown G
Br J Surg; 2008 Feb; 95(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 17932879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Laparoscopic mesorectal excision with preservation of the pelvic autonomic nerves for rectal cancer.
Fukunaga Y; Higashino M; Tanimura S; Kishida S; Fujiwara Y; Ogata A; Osugi H
Hepatogastroenterology; 2007; 54(73):85-90. PubMed ID: 17419237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Preoperative 3T MR imaging of rectal cancer: local staging accuracy using a two-dimensional and three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence.
Fütterer JJ; Yakar D; Strijk SP; Barentsz JO
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 18164156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Defining pelvic factors in sphincter-preservation of low rectal cancer with a three-dimensional digital model of pelvis.
Gu J; Bo XF; Xiong CY; Wu AW; Zhang XP; Li M; An Q; Fang J; Li J; Zhang X; Wang HY; Gao F; You WC
Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Oct; 49(10):1517-26. PubMed ID: 17001440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Algorithms for the surgical management of retrorectal tumours.
Woodfield JC; Chalmers AG; Phillips N; Sagar PM
Br J Surg; 2008 Feb; 95(2):214-21. PubMed ID: 17933000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.
Kim CK; Kim SH; Choi D; Kim MJ; Chun HK; Lee SJ; Lee JM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 18043346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Surgical strategy for local recurrence after resection of rectal cancer.
Fujii S; Shimada H; Yamagishi S; Ota M; Ichikawa Y; Kunisaki C; Ike H; Ohki S
Hepatogastroenterology; 2009; 56(91-92):667-71. PubMed ID: 19621677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the preoperative staging of rectum cancer].
Mortensen LA; Leffers AM; Holck S; Bülow S; Achiam M
Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Aug; 171(35):2476-81. PubMed ID: 19732535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Pelvic exenteration for clinical T4 rectal cancer: oncologic outcome in 93 patients at a single institution over a 30-year period.
Ishiguro S; Akasu T; Fujita S; Yamamoto S; Kusters M; Moriya Y
Surgery; 2009 Feb; 145(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 19167974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
