These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17032444)

  • 1. The relationship between facial skeletal class and expert-rated interpersonal skill: an epidemiological survey on young Italian adults.
    Senna A; Abbenante D; Tremolizzo L; Campus G; Strohmenger L
    BMC Psychiatry; 2006 Oct; 6():41. PubMed ID: 17032444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions.
    Todd SA; Hammond P; Hutton T; Cochrane S; Cunningham S
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 15961568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ranking facial attractiveness.
    Knight H; Keith O
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 16043472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Morphometric analysis of facial profile in adults.
    Krey KF; Dannhauer KH
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Nov; 69(6):424-36. PubMed ID: 19169639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electromyographic activity of masticatory, neck and trunk muscles of subjects with different skeletal facial morphology--a cross-sectional evaluation.
    Tecco S; Caputi S; Festa F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jul; 34(7):478-86. PubMed ID: 17559615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness.
    Johnston DJ; Hunt O; Johnston CD; Burden DJ; Stevenson M; Hepper P
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 15961569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The shape and size of the sella turcica in skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III Saudi subjects.
    Alkofide EA
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):457-63. PubMed ID: 17693429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Facial attractiveness: a longitudinal study.
    Tatarunaite E; Playle R; Hood K; Shaw W; Richmond S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):676-82; quiz 755. PubMed ID: 15953892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population.
    Macías Gago AB; Romero Maroto M; Crego A
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 21447783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions.
    Abu Arqoub SH; Al-Khateeb SN
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 20558590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The ideal of facial beauty: a review.
    Hönn M; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Jan; 68(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 17238049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The enigma of facial beauty: esthetics, proportions, deformity, and controversy.
    Naini FB; Moss JP; Gill DS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 16979484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Craniofacial profile in Southern Chinese with hypodontia.
    Chan DW; Samman N; McMillan AS
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19193707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of mandibular prominence on facial attractiveness.
    Johnston C; Hunt O; Burden D; Stevenson M; Hepper P
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Apr; 27(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 15817618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Facial anthropometry and aesthetic perception in young italian subjects: their use for orthognatic surgery].
    Ramieri G; Spada MC; Nasi A; Tavolaccini A; Berrone S
    Minerva Stomatol; 2002 Dec; 51(11-12):479-93. PubMed ID: 12660615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cephalometric study of elderly with nearly intact dental arches.
    Shimizu T; Motegi E; Nomura M; Kaneko Y; Takeuchi F; Yamaguchi T; Miyazaki H; Harazaki M; Hirai M; Kurihara S; Yamaguchi H
    Gerodontology; 2006 Mar; 23(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16433644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Roentgencephalometric standards for the facial skeleton and soft tissue profile of Swedish children and young adults. II. Comparisons with earlier Scandinavian normative data.
    Thilander B; Persson M; Skagius S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982; 15():219-28. PubMed ID: 6963777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.