These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17032444)

  • 21. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Soft-tissue facial characteristics of attractive Italian women as compared to normal women.
    Sforza C; Laino A; D'Alessio R; Grandi G; Binelli M; Ferrario VF
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 19123721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of facial proportions and anthropometric norms among Turkish young adults with different face types.
    Arslan SG; Genç C; Odabaş B; Kama JD
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2008 Mar; 32(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 17952492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Study on perception of Shanghai population with labial profile].
    Tang GH; Ji GP; Ding XJ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2003 Apr; 12(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 14661511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Facial esthetics in adolescents and its relationship to "ideal" ratios and angles.
    Kiekens RM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; van 't Hof MA; van 't Hof BE; Straatman H; Maltha JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):188.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18249280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An Asian community's perspective on facial profile attractiveness.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 35(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17244134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion.
    Alexander AE; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):700.e1-14; discussion 700-1. PubMed ID: 19524825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of panel composition on aesthetic evaluation of adolescent faces.
    Kiekens RM; van 't Hof MA; Straatman H; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Maltha JC
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 17290021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Gender and age differences in facial expressions.
    Houstis O; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):459-66. PubMed ID: 19541798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cephalometric norms for the Saudi children living in the western region of Saudi Arabia: a research report.
    Hassan AH
    Head Face Med; 2005 Aug; 1():5. PubMed ID: 16270926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The "jaguar's eye" as a new beauty trend? Age-related effects in judging the attractiveness of the oblique eye axis.
    Gründl M; Klein S; Horczakiwskyj R; Feser D; Jung M; Eisenmann-Klein M; Prantl L
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2008 Nov; 32(6):915-9. PubMed ID: 18506510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perceived relative attractiveness of facial profiles with varying degrees of skeletal anomalies.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Godt A; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 May; 66(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 15959632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Facial attractiveness and self-esteem in adolescence.
    Mares SH; de Leeuw RN; Scholte RH; Engels RC
    J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol; 2010; 39(5):627-37. PubMed ID: 20706916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cephalometric measures as indicators of facial attractiveness.
    Tulloch C; Phillips C; Dann C
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 8301165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of averageness and sexual dimorphism on the judgment of facial attractiveness.
    Komori M; Kawamura S; Ishihara S
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(8):862-9. PubMed ID: 19285521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Facial beauty--establishing a universal standard.
    Jefferson Y
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2004; 15(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 15085778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Changes in facial profile of young adults with normal occlusion: a longitudinal study.
    Tibana RH; Palagi LM; Carneiro MS; Almeida MA; Miguel JA
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 18575305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A method for defining targets in contemporary incisor inclination correction.
    Knösel M; Engelke W; Attin R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Sadat-Khonsari R; Gripp-Rudolph L
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 18678757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults.
    Uysal T; Yagci A; Basciftci FA; Sisman Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 19482876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.