These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17033276)

  • 1. Improving the accuracy of impedance cardiac output in the intensive care unit: comparison with thermodilution cardiac output.
    Fuller HD
    Congest Heart Fail; 2006; 12(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 17033276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Whole-body impedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output.
    Kööbi T; Kaukinen S; Turjanmaa VM; Uusitalo AJ
    Crit Care Med; 1997 May; 25(5):779-85. PubMed ID: 9187596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impedance cardiography. Importance of the equation and the electrode configuration.
    van der Meer BJ; Woltjer HH; Sousman AM; Schreuder WO; Bulder ER; Huybregts MA; de Vries PM
    Intensive Care Med; 1996 Oct; 22(10):1120-4. PubMed ID: 8923081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of transthoracic electrical impedance and thermodilution methods for measuring cardiac output.
    Donovan KD; Dobb GJ; Woods WP; Hockings BE
    Crit Care Med; 1986 Dec; 14(12):1038-44. PubMed ID: 3780246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cardiac output can be reliably measured noninvasively after coronary artery bypass grafting operation.
    Kööbi T; Kaukinen S; Turjanmaa VM
    Crit Care Med; 1999 Oct; 27(10):2206-11. PubMed ID: 10548208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of extravascular lung water on cardiac output measurements using thoracic impedance cardiography.
    Raaijmakers E; Faes TJ; Kunst PW; Bakker J; Rommes JH; Goovaerts HG; Heethaar RM
    Physiol Meas; 1998 Nov; 19(4):491-9. PubMed ID: 9863675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Noninvasive whole-body electrical bioimpedance cardiac output and invasive thermodilution cardiac output in high-risk surgical patients.
    Imhoff M; Lehner JH; Löhlein D
    Crit Care Med; 2000 Aug; 28(8):2812-8. PubMed ID: 10966255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two impedance cardiographic techniques for measuring cardiac output.
    Gotshall RW; Wood VC; Miles DS
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1989; 17(5):495-505. PubMed ID: 2610421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cardiac output by impedance cardiography: two alternative methodologies compared with thermodilution.
    Sherwood A; Carter LS; Murphy CA
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1991 Feb; 62(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 2001207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Standardization of non-invasive impedance cardiography for assessment of stroke volume: comparison with thermodilution.
    Woltjer HH; Bogaard HJ; Scheffer GJ; van der Spoel HI; Huybregts MA; de Vries PM
    Br J Anaesth; 1996 Dec; 77(6):748-52. PubMed ID: 9014628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cardiac output measurement after coronary artery bypass grafting using bolus thermodilution, continuous thermodilution, and whole-body impedance cardiography.
    Kaukinen S; Kööbi T; Bi Y; Turjanmaa VM
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2003 Apr; 17(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 12698402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impedance cardiography in cardiac surgery patients: abnormal body weight gives unreliable cardiac output measurements.
    van der Meer BJ; de Vries JP; Schreuder WO; Bulder ER; Eysman L; de Vries PM
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1997 Jun; 41(6):708-12. PubMed ID: 9241329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity of cardiac output measurement by computer-averaged impedance cardiography, and comparison with simultaneous thermodilution determinations.
    Pickett BR; Buell JC
    Am J Cardiol; 1992 May; 69(16):1354-8. PubMed ID: 1585872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method.
    Engoren M; Barbee D
    Am J Crit Care; 2005 Jan; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15608107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impedance cardiography: the next vital sign technology?
    Van De Water JM; Miller TW; Vogel RL; Mount BE; Dalton ML
    Chest; 2003 Jun; 123(6):2028-33. PubMed ID: 12796185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of weight on stroke volume determination by means of impedance cardiography in cardiac surgery patients.
    Woltjer HH; Bogaard HJ; van der Spoel HI; de Vries PM
    Intensive Care Med; 1996 Aug; 22(8):766-71. PubMed ID: 8880245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two impedance cardiographic techniques for measuring cardiac output in critically ill patients.
    Gotshall RW; Wood VC; Miles DS
    Crit Care Med; 1989 Aug; 17(8):806-11. PubMed ID: 2752776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy and Efficacy of Impedance Cardiography as a Non-Invasive Cardiac Function Monitor.
    Kim GE; Kim SY; Kim SJ; Yun SY; Jung HH; Kang YS; Koo BN
    Yonsei Med J; 2019 Aug; 60(8):735-741. PubMed ID: 31347328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of cardiac output measurements by thermodilution and thoracic electrical bioimpedance in critically ill versus non-critically ill patients.
    Weiss S; Calloway E; Cairo J; Granger W; Winslow J
    Am J Emerg Med; 1995 Nov; 13(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 7575799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Importance of re-calibration time on pulse contour analysis agreement with thermodilution measurements of cardiac output: a retrospective analysis of intensive care unit patients.
    Scully CG; Gomatam S; Forrest S; Strauss DG
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):577-86. PubMed ID: 26285740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.