245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17035867)
1. Evaluation of catheter loops in central venous port systems.
Behrendt FF; Wingen M; Katoh M; Guenther RW; Buecker A
Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov; 41(11):777-80. PubMed ID: 17035867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.
Nosher JL; Bodner LJ; Ettinger LJ; Siegel RL; Gribbin C; Asch J; Drachtman RA
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technical benefits and outcomes of modified upwardly created subcutaneous chest pockets for placing central venous ports: single-center experience.
Lee SH; Chun HJ; Choi BG
Acta Radiol; 2009 May; 50(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19267272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients.
Lorch H; Zwaan M; Kagel C; Weiss HD
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 11443406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Implantable catheter systems. Experiences with 1000 patients with central venous ports].
Kock HJ; Krause U; Pietsch M; Rasfeld S; Walz MK
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1996 Jan; 121(3):47-51. PubMed ID: 8565809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Totally implantable venous access systems. Analysis of complications].
D'Angelo F; Ramacciato G; Caramitti A; Aurello P; Lauro S; Bordin F; Della Casa U
Minerva Chir; 1997; 52(7-8):937-42. PubMed ID: 9411296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Complications after insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in patients treated with chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma].
Hoareau-Gruchet F; Rtail R; Sulaj H; Khirnetkina A; Reyt E; Righini CA
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2009 Apr; 126(2):43-52. PubMed ID: 19324328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aspects of central venous access catheter usage in patients with malignancy.
Hardman D; Englund R; Hanel K
N Z Med J; 1994 Jun; 107(979):224-6. PubMed ID: 8208484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Port-A-Cath implantation using percutaneous puncture without guidance.
Ku YH; Kuo PH; Tsai YF; Huang WT; Lin MH; Tsao CJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 19101767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors predicting subcutaneous implanted central venous port function: the relationship between catheter tip location and port failure in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
Cohn DE; Mutch DG; Rader JS; Farrell M; Awantang R; Herzog TJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):533-6. PubMed ID: 11733967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Central venous access port-related complications in outpatient chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.
Inaba Y; Yamaura H; Sato Y; Najima M; Shimamoto H; Nishiofuku H; Ura T; Muro K
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2007 Dec; 37(12):951-4. PubMed ID: 18057011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective randomized trial demonstrating valved implantable ports have fewer complications and lower overall cost than nonvalved implantable ports.
Carlo JT; Lamont JP; McCarty TM; Livingston S; Kuhn JA
Am J Surg; 2004 Dec; 188(6):722-7. PubMed ID: 15619490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An 11-year retrospective study of totally implanted central venous access ports: complications and patient satisfaction.
Ignatov A; Hoffman O; Smith B; Fahlke J; Peters B; Bischoff J; Costa SD
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Mar; 35(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 18329836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Ultrasound guided implantation of chest port systems via the lateral subclavian vein].
Zähringer M; Hilgers J; Krüger K; Strohe D; Bangard C; Neumann L; Warm M; Reiser M; Töx U; Lackner K
Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 16508841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of the right external jugular vein as the preferred access site when the right internal jugular vein is not usable.
Cho SK; Shin SW; Do YS; Park KB; Choo SW; Choo IW
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 May; 17(5):823-9. PubMed ID: 16687748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. External jugular Groshong catheter is associated with fewer complications than a subclavian Argyle catheter.
Ishizuka M; Nagata H; Takagi K; Horie T; Furihata M; Nakagawa A; Kubota K
Eur Surg Res; 2008; 40(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 17998779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experience with the intravenous totally implanted port in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
Nelson BE; Mayer AR; Tseng PC; Schwartz PE
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Apr; 53(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 8175028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The fluoroscopy-guided implantation of subcutaneous venous ports: the complications and long-term results].
Kluge A; Stroh H; Wagner D; Rauber K
Rofo; 1998 Jul; 169(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 9711285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Totally implantable venous access ports: frequency of complications and analysis of bacterial contamination after ablation].
Barbut F; Soukouna S; Lalande V; Garcia ML; Neyme D; de Gramont A; Petit JC
Pathol Biol (Paris); 2004 Dec; 52(10):566-74. PubMed ID: 15596304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Percutaneous implant of Hickman catheters and reservoirs. Long-term experience].
Carreira Villamor JM; Reyes Pérez R; Pulido-Duque JM; Gorriz Gómez E; Pardo MD; Argiles Vives JM; Eyheremendy EP; Maynar Moliner M
Rev Clin Esp; 1997 Nov; 197(11):740-4. PubMed ID: 9547192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
