106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17035874)
1. Operator-dependent reproducibility of size measurements of small phantoms and lung nodules examined with low-dose thin-section computed tomography.
Picozzi G; Diciotti S; Falchini M; Foresti S; Gallesi F; Cavigli E; Livi L; Villari N; Mascalchi M
Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov; 41(11):831-9. PubMed ID: 17035874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of the CT numbers of simulated lung nodules imaged with multi-detector CT scanners.
Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Way TW; Larson SC; Christodoulou EG; Kim J
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3006-17. PubMed ID: 16964879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-aided volumetry of pulmonary nodules exhibiting ground-glass opacity at MDCT.
Oda S; Awai K; Murao K; Ozawa A; Yanaga Y; Kawanaka K; Yamashita Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):398-406. PubMed ID: 20093602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo repeatability of automated volume calculations of small pulmonary nodules with CT.
Rampinelli C; De Fiori E; Raimondi S; Veronesi G; Bellomi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1657-61. PubMed ID: 19457831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the assessment of pulmonary nodule size on CT using film and computer display methods.
Bogot NR; Kazerooni EA; Kelly AM; Quint LE; Desjardins B; Nan B
Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):948-56. PubMed ID: 16087090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of accuracy and precision of manual size measurements in chest tomosynthesis using simulated pulmonary nodules.
Söderman C; Johnsson ÅA; Vikgren J; Norrlund RR; Molnar D; Svalkvist A; Månsson LG; Båth M
Acad Radiol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 25601303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 1D, 2D, and 3D nodule sizing methods by radiologists for spherical and complex nodules on thoracic CT phantom images.
Petrick N; Kim HJ; Clunie D; Borradaile K; Ford R; Zeng R; Gavrielides MA; McNitt-Gray MF; Lu ZQ; Fenimore C; Zhao B; Buckler AJ
Acad Radiol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 24331262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The LoG characteristic scale: a consistent measurement of lung nodule size in CT imaging.
Diciotti S; Lombardo S; Coppini G; Grassi L; Falchini M; Mascalchi M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Feb; 29(2):397-409. PubMed ID: 20129846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology.
Petrou M; Quint LE; Nan B; Baker LH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 17242235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of lung nodule margin on volume- and diameter-based reader variability in CT lung cancer screening.
Han D; Heuvelmans MA; Vliegenthart R; Rook M; Dorrius MD; de Jonge GJ; Walter JE; van Ooijen PMA; de Koning HJ; Oudkerk M
Br J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 91(1090):20170405. PubMed ID: 28972803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of flat-panel-detector-based CT and multidetector-row CT in automated volumetry of pulmonary nodules using an anthropomorphic chest phantom.
Marten K; Dullin C; Machann W; Schmid JS; DAS M; Hermann KP; Engelke C
Br J Radiol; 2009 Aug; 82(981):716-23. PubMed ID: 19332516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Small irregular pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: observer detection sensitivity and volumetry accuracy.
Xie X; Willemink MJ; de Jong PA; van Ooijen PM; Oudkerk M; Vliegenthart R; Greuter MJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):W202-9. PubMed ID: 24555615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pulmonary nodules: sensitivity of maximum intensity projection versus that of volume rendering of 3D multidetector CT data.
Peloschek P; Sailer J; Weber M; Herold CJ; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop C
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):561-9. PubMed ID: 17456878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pulmonary nodule volume: effects of reconstruction parameters on automated measurements--a phantom study.
Ravenel JG; Leue WM; Nietert PJ; Miller JV; Taylor KK; Silvestri GA
Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):400-8. PubMed ID: 18430874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeatability of small lung nodule measurement in low-dose lung screening: a phantom study.
Du Y; Shi GF; Wang YN; Wang Q; Feng H
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Oct; 20(1):112. PubMed ID: 33008318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility of computer-aided volumetry of artificial small pulmonary nodules in ex vivo porcine lungs.
Bolte H; Riedel C; Jahnke T; Inan N; Freitag S; Kohl G; Heller M; Biederer J
Invest Radiol; 2006 Jan; 41(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 16355037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter- and intrascanner variability of pulmonary nodule volumetry on low-dose 64-row CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study.
Xie X; Willemink MJ; Zhao Y; de Jong PA; van Ooijen PM; Oudkerk M; Greuter MJ; Vliegenthart R
Br J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 86(1029):20130160. PubMed ID: 23884758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A phantom study of nodule size evaluation with chest tomosynthesis and computed tomography.
Johnsson AA; Svalkvist A; Vikgren J; Boijsen M; Flinck A; Kheddache S; Båth M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 20133329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated volumetry of solid pulmonary nodules in a phantom: accuracy across different CT scanner technologies.
Das M; Mühlenbruch G; Katoh M; Bakai A; Salganicoff M; Stanzel S; Mahnken AH; Günther RW; Wildberger JE
Invest Radiol; 2007 May; 42(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17414525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility.
Wormanns D; Kohl G; Klotz E; Marheine A; Beyer F; Heindel W; Diederich S
Eur Radiol; 2004 Jan; 14(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 14615902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
