These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
82. Reproducibility of operator processing for radiation dosimetry. Shen S; DeNardo GL; DeNardo SJ; Yuan A; DeNardo DA; Lamborn KR Nucl Med Biol; 1997 Jan; 24(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 9080478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Estimation or quantification of tumour volume? CT study on irregular phantoms. Tiitola M; Kivisaari L; Tervahartiala P; Palomäki M; Kivisaari RP; Mankinen P; Vehmas T Acta Radiol; 2001 Jan; 42(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 11167341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Statistical issues in the comparison of quantitative imaging biomarker algorithms using pulmonary nodule volume as an example. Obuchowski NA; Barnhart HX; Buckler AJ; Pennello G; Wang XF; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Kim HJ; Reeves AP; Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Feb; 24(1):107-40. PubMed ID: 24919828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. From low-dose to no-dose: thin-section magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of pulmonary nodules. D'Angelo T; Vogl TJ; Wichmann JL J Thorac Dis; 2018 Apr; 10(Suppl 9):S1055-S1057. PubMed ID: 29850184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
87. Output rates among machine operators; distributions and their reliability. ROTHE HF J Appl Psychol; 1947 Oct; 31(5):484-9. PubMed ID: 20267800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
88. Factors influencing the outcome of volumetry tools for pulmonary nodule analysis: a systematic review and attempted meta-analysis. Guedes Pinto E; Penha D; Ravara S; Monaghan C; Hochhegger B; Marchiori E; Taborda-Barata L; Irion K Insights Imaging; 2023 Sep; 14(1):152. PubMed ID: 37741928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT: What We Have Learned in Two Decades of ITALUNG and What Is Yet to Be Addressed. Mascalchi M; Picozzi G; Puliti D; Diciotti S; Deliperi A; Romei C; Falaschi F; Pistelli F; Grazzini M; Vannucchi L; Bisanzi S; Zappa M; Gorini G; Carozzi FM; Carrozzi L; Paci E Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Jun; 13(13):. PubMed ID: 37443590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. Accuracy of the CT numbers of simulated lung nodules imaged with multi-detector CT scanners. Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Way TW; Larson SC; Christodoulou EG; Kim J Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3006-17. PubMed ID: 16964879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Computer-aided volumetry of pulmonary nodules exhibiting ground-glass opacity at MDCT. Oda S; Awai K; Murao K; Ozawa A; Yanaga Y; Kawanaka K; Yamashita Y AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):398-406. PubMed ID: 20093602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. In vivo repeatability of automated volume calculations of small pulmonary nodules with CT. Rampinelli C; De Fiori E; Raimondi S; Veronesi G; Bellomi M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1657-61. PubMed ID: 19457831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the assessment of pulmonary nodule size on CT using film and computer display methods. Bogot NR; Kazerooni EA; Kelly AM; Quint LE; Desjardins B; Nan B Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):948-56. PubMed ID: 16087090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Operator-dependent reproducibility of size measurements of small phantoms and lung nodules examined with low-dose thin-section computed tomography. Picozzi G; Diciotti S; Falchini M; Foresti S; Gallesi F; Cavigli E; Livi L; Villari N; Mascalchi M Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov; 41(11):831-9. PubMed ID: 17035874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]