These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17036429)

  • 1. Behavioural genetics: why eugenic selection is preferable to enhancement.
    Savulescu J; Hemsley M; Newson A; Foddy B
    J Appl Philos; 2006; 23(2):157-71. PubMed ID: 17036429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beneficence, determinism and justice: an engagement with the argument for the genetic selection of intelligence.
    Birch K
    Bioethics; 2005 Feb; 19(1):12-28. PubMed ID: 15812970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why genetic testing for genes for criminality is morally required.
    Savulescu J
    Princet J Bioeth; 2001; 4():79-97. PubMed ID: 12166468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetics and human behaviour: the ethical context--summary and recommendations.
    Nuffield Council on Bioethics
    J Int Bioethique; 2003; 14(3-4):171-92. PubMed ID: 15281207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Causing disabled people to exist and causing people to be disabled.
    McMahan J
    Ethics; 2005 Oct; 116(1):77-99. PubMed ID: 16578952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children.
    Savulescu J
    Bioethics; 2001 Oct; 15(5-6):413-26. PubMed ID: 12058767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic dilemmas and the child's right to an open future.
    Davis DS
    Rutgers Law J; 1997; 28():549-92. PubMed ID: 12465646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The nonidentity problem, disability, and the role morality of prospective parents.
    Wasserman D
    Ethics; 2005 Oct; 116(1):132-52. PubMed ID: 16578954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical ethics and reproductive genetics in Swedish public discourse.
    Dekker C
    Biomed Ethics; 2000; 5(3):100-5. PubMed ID: 12755111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic testing and its implications: human genetics researchers grapple with ethical issues.
    Rabino I
    Sci Technol Human Values; 2003; 28(3):365-402. PubMed ID: 16208885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prenatal diagnosis and the selection of children.
    Botkin JR
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 2003; 30(2):265-93. PubMed ID: 15083831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic selection of offspring characteristics.
    Robertson JA
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1996 Jun; 76(3):421-82. PubMed ID: 11660289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interventions in the human genome.
    McLean SA
    Mod Law Rev; 1998 Sep; 61(5):681-96. PubMed ID: 14518447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The search for perfection.
    Harris J; Shakespeare T; Phillips K; Bruce D
    New Sci; 2002 May; 174(2342):52-4. PubMed ID: 12408144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The post-humanist embryo: genetic manipulation, assisted reproductive technologies and the Principle of Procreative Beneficence.
    Güell Pelayo F
    Cuad Bioet; 2014; 25(85):427-43. PubMed ID: 25684382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Choosing the sexual orientation of children.
    Stein E
    Bioethics; 1998 Jan; 12(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 11655306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A feminist is a person who answers "yes" to the question, "are women human?": an argument against the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for gender selection.
    Downing KK
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 2005; 8(2):431-60. PubMed ID: 16538759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetics, parenting, and children's rights in the twenty-first century.
    Florencio PS
    McGill Law J; 2000 May; 45(2):527-58. PubMed ID: 12688284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex selection and disability avoidance: is their opposed treatment conceptually consistent?
    Anstey KW
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2002 Jan; 21(1):10-28. PubMed ID: 15828156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Appropriate aims: setting boundaries for reprogenetic technology.
    Ziker D
    Duke Law Technol Rev; 2002 Jul; ():E1. PubMed ID: 15709285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.